Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, J. N.

Radiology, Vol 121, 545-552, Copyright © 1976 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age

JN Wolfe

The appearance of the breast parenchyma was studied in 955 women to determine whether it changed with age. It was found that women initially classified as being at either a low risk or a very high risk of cancer do not demonstrate changes in the breast parenchyma pattern with age. However, breasts in young women which exhibit dysplastic changes on the initial examination (QDY) frequently do change, occasionally to a relatively lower-risk category but often to a normal or near-normal appearance. Such changes generally occur between the ages of 35 and 50.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Wang, P.-L. Torng, T.-P. Liu, K.-L. Chen, and T. T.-F. Shih
Proton MR Spectroscopy in Normal Breasts Between Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: A Preliminary Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. A. Causer, R. A. Jong, E. Warner, K. Hill, J. W. Wong, B. N. Curpen, and D. B. Plewes
Breast Cancers Detected with Imaging Screening in the BRCA Population: Emphasis on MR Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S165 - S182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. J. R. Porter, A. J. Evans, E. J. Cornford, H. C. Burrell, J. J. James, A. H. S. Lee, and J. Chakrabarti
Influence of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern in Screening-Detected and Interval Invasive Breast Cancers on Pathologic Features, Mammographic Features, and Patient Survival
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M C Aznar, B Hemdal, J Medin, C J Marckmann, C E Andersen, L Botter-Jensen, I Andersson, and S Mattsson
In vivo absorbed dose measurements in mammography using a new real-time luminescence technique
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 328 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Vranjesevic, C. Schiepers, D. H. Silverman, A. Quon, J. Villalpando, M. Dahlbom, M. E. Phelps, and J. Czernin
Relationship Between 18F-FDG Uptake and Breast Density in Women with Normal Breast Tissue
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1238 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Ursin, H. Ma, A. H. Wu, L. Bernstein, M. Salane, Y. R. Parisky, M. Astrahan, C. C. Siozon, and M. C. Pike
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer in Three Ethnic Groups
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 332 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. Boyd, L. Martin, J. Stone, L. Little, S. Minkin, and M. Yaffe
A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Menopause on Mammographic Features
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2002; 11(10): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J.-J. Ren and P. G. Peer
A study on effectiveness of screening mammograms
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2000; 29(5): 803 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. K. Chow, D. Venzon, E. C. Jones, A. Premkumar, J. O’Shaughnessy, and J. Zujewski
Effect of Tamoxifen on Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P. L. Porter, D. White, C. A. Finder, S. H. Taplin, and E. White
Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 5, 2000; 92(13): 1081 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Knight, L. J. Martin, C. V. Greenberg, G. A. Lockwood, J. W. Byng, M. J. Yaffe, D. L. Tritchler, and N. F. Boyd
Macronutrient Intake and Change in Mammographic Density at Menopause: Results from a Randomized Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 1999; 8(2): 123 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1976 by the Radiological Society of North America.