Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornbury, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vinson, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornbury, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vinson, R. K.

Radiology, Vol 122, 81-84, Copyright © 1977 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Ureteroceles vs. pseudoureteroceles in adults. Urographic diagnosis

JR Thornbury, TM Silver and RK Vinson

Simple ureteroceles discovered in adults on excretory urography have long been regarded as congenital anomalies, usually innocuous. Pseudoureteroceles are acquired dilatations of the submucosal portion of the distal ureter that mimic simple ureteroceles. The authors compared 5 pseudoureteroceles and 13 simple ureteroceles and found that the former were distinguished by asymmetry of the dilated ureteral lumen, moderate to severe obstruction of the upper tract, and evidence of an acquired cause such as a calculus or abnormal vesical mucosal pattern. The distinction is important, since most pseudoureteroceles were related to malignancy involving the bladder.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1977 by the Radiological Society of North America.