Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Revesz, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kundel, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Revesz, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kundel, H. L.

Radiology, Vol 123, 559-562, Copyright © 1977 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Psychophysical studies of detection errors in chest radiology

G Revesz and HL Kundel

In 62 of 124 cases analyzed, there occurred a failure to detect a pulmonary nodule which was retrospectively noted only after detection at a subsequent examination. The characteristics of the lesions and their surrounds were measured, and a computer analysis used, to identify that combination of parameters (the conspicuity, K) which was best capable of separating the group into populations of missed and detected lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BrainHome page
R. P. Lesser, H. W. Lee, W. R. S. Webber, B. Prince, N. E. Crone, and D. L. Miglioretti
Short-term variations in response distribution to cortical stimulation
Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1528 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
B. M. Moores, S. Mattsson, L. G. Mansson, W. Panzer, D. Regulla, D. Dance, G. Alm Carlsson, F. R. Verdun, E. Buhr, and C. Hoeschen
RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 450 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
P. D. Smith, J. Temte, J. W. Beasley, and M. Mundt
Radiographs in the Office: Is a Second Reading Always Needed?
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2004; 17(4): 256 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
D. B. Kopans
Mammography Screening Is Saving Thousands of Lives, but Will It Survive Medical Malpractice?
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 20 - 24.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
E. Samei, M. J. Flynn, E. Peterson, and W. R. Eyler
Subtle Lung Nodules: Influence of Local Anatomic Variations on Detection
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 76 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
D. B. Kopans
The Accuracy of Mammographic Interpretation
N. Engl. J. Med., December 1, 1994; 331(22): 1521 - 1522.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1977 by the Radiological Society of North America.