Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sternick, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Curran, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sternick, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Curran, B.

Radiology, Vol 124, 835-836, Copyright © 1977 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Comparison of computed tomography and conventional transverse axial tomography in radiotherapy treatment planning

ES Sternick, FW Lane and B Curran

Treatment plans can differ widely depending on whether they were developed from anatomical information generated by computed tomography or conventional transverse axial tomography. In the present study, deviations between tumor doses calculated using the two methods were as great as 10%, increasing to 20% for the spinal cord.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1977 by the Radiological Society of North America.