Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godwin, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lipton, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Godwin, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lipton, M. J.

Radiology, Vol 136, 125-133, Copyright © 1980 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Evaluation of dissections and aneurysms of the thoracic aorta by conventional and dynamic CT scanning

JD Godwin, RL Herfkens, CG Skioldebrand, MP Federle and MJ Lipton

Conventional computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast injection effectively demonstrates the features of aneurysms of the thoracic aorta (dilatation, calcification, intraluminal thrombus, and displacement and erosion of adjacent structures). In aortic dissection, CT can establish the diagnosis by demonstrating (a) double channels with an intimal flap or (b) displaced intimal calcifications if one channel is thrombosed. Dynamic CT following a contrast bolus shows the relative rate of filling of the true and false channels and demonstrates the intimal flap with optimum clarity. Reformatted CT images (paraxial and oblique) display the entire thoracic aorta in the plane of the arch, resembling an aortogram. CT is noninvasive and can be easily repeated to assess progress. Although aortography is still required prior to surgery in some cases, CT is a safe screening procedure that may avoid some invasive angiographic procedures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Lipton, L. M. Boxt, and Z. M. Hijazi
Role of the Radiologist in Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1495 - 1506.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. G. Hagan, C. A. Nienaber, E. M. Isselbacher, D. Bruckman, D. J. Karavite, P. L. Russman, A. Evangelista, R. Fattori, T. Suzuki, J. K. Oh, et al.
The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): New Insights Into an Old Disease
JAMA, February 16, 2000; 283(7): 897 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. L. Creswell, N. T. Kouchoukos, J. L. Cox, and M. Rosenbloom
Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1995; 59(3): 585 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. A. Nienaber, Y. von Kodolitsch, V. Nicolas, V. Siglow, A. Piepho, C. Brockhoff, D. H. Koschyk, and R. P. Spielmann
The Diagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Noninvasive Imaging Procedures
N. Engl. J. Med., January 7, 1993; 328(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. E. Cigarroa, E. M. Isselbacher, R. W. DeSanctis, and K. A. Eagle
Diagnostic Imaging in the Evaluation of Suspected Aortic Dissection -- Old Standards and New Directions
N. Engl. J. Med., January 7, 1993; 328(1): 35 - 43.
[Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
M. Okamoto, T. Tsubokura, G. Kajiyama, K. Miyatake, N. Kinoshita, H. Sakakibara, and Y. Nimura
Flow Velocity Measurement and Differentiation Between True and False Lumens in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Dissection by Use of Pulsed Doppler Echocardiography
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 1990; 24(4): 265 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1980 by the Radiological Society of North America.