Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiener, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Edelstein, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiener, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Edelstein, J.

Radiology, Vol 136, 181-185, Copyright © 1980 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Observer performance with computer-generated images of 201Tl-Cl myocardial perfusion

SN Wiener, MJ Flynn and J Edelstein

The effect of simple image processing on the interpretation of 201Tl-Cl myocardial perfusion images were evaluated by ROC analysis. Polaroid images of the cathode ray tube of an Anger camera and computer- processed transparent images recorded in color and shades of gray were examined by multiple observers. A total of 198 observer responses was accumulated for each of five image formats. The observer responses were compared with results established by coronary angiography. Better observer performance was obtained for all computer-generated images except in the region of low false positive values. The responses for color-scale formats were, in general, superior to those from the gray- scale formats. No significant improvement in observer performance resulted from the use of background subtraction with a rescaling of the 16-level gray scale to the residual information. When nine-point smoothing was applied to the color-scale display format, there was a poorer observer response.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1980 by the Radiological Society of North America.