Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golimbu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Delman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golimbu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Delman, A.

Radiology, Vol 151, 731-733, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Computed tomography of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures that have been treated with Harrington instrumentation

C Golimbu, H Firooznia, M Rafii, G Engler and A Delman

Twenty patients with fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine underwent computed tomography (CT) following Harrington distraction instrumentation and spinal fusion. CT was done to search for a cause of persistent cord or nerve root compression in those patients who failed to improve and completely recover their partial neurologic deficit (14 cases). In 6 patients seen in the late recovery period, CT was performed to evaluate the causes of pain and instability at the fracture site. Even though the image was degraded due to the artifacts generated by the metallic rods, significant information was available in each case. The most common abnormality was the presence of residual bone fragments originating in the burst fracture of a vertebral body displaced posteriorly, into the spinal canal. In patients with complications in the late recovery period, CT found exuberant callus indenting the canal or lack of fusion of the bone grafts placed in the anterolateral aspect of the vertebral bodies. This experience indicates that CT is the modality of choice for spinal canal evaluation in those patients who fail to have an optimal clinical course following fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine treated with Harrington rods.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ohashi, G. Y. El-Khoury, D. L. Bennett, J. M. Restrepo, and K. S. Berbaum
Orthopedic Hardware Complications Diagnosed with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 570 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.