|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 166, 111-114, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
K Togashi, K Nishimura, K Itoh, I Fujisawa, S Noma, M Kanaoka, Y Nakano, H Itoh, H Ozasa and S Fujii
Department of Radiology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, Japan.
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of adenomyosis were studied in eight women (aged 37-49 years) who underwent hysterectomy, and detailed radiologic/pathologic correlation was conducted in all cases. Adenomyosis produced diffuse and smooth uterine enlargement. The extent of the lesion was clearly identified on images obtained with long repetition time and long echo time; a diffuse, low-intensity area accompanied by tiny high-intensity spots was seen subjacent to the endometrium. The area appeared as a localized or diffuse thickening of the junctional zone because it was often isointense with this zone. Pathologic examination confirmed that the extent of adenomyosis correlated well with the low-intensity region on MR images and that both hemorrhagic areas and nonbleeding endometrial tissue corresponded to the high-intensity spots. The lesion consisted of distorted and compacted smooth muscle cells, but microscopic studies failed to explain the definitive difference in intensity between areas of adenomyosis and myometrium.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bazot, C. Bornier, G. Dubernard, G. Roseau, A. Cortez, and E. Darai Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1457 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Kim, S. Kim, N. K. Kim, M. H. Lee, E. H. Ahn, H. J. Kim, J. H. Cho, and S. H. Cha Long-Term Results of Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Spielmann, C. Keogh, B. B. Forster, M. L. Martin, and L. S. Machan Comparison of MRI and sonography in the preliminary evaluation for fibroid embolization. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1499 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kuligowska, L. Deeds III, and K. Lu III Pelvic Pain: Overlooked and Underdiagnosed Gynecologic Conditions RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 3 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tamai, K. Togashi, T. Ito, N. Morisawa, T. Fujiwara, and T. Koyama MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 21 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bazot, E. Darai, R. Hourani, I. Thomassin, A. Cortez, S. Uzan, and J.-N. Buy Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: MR Imaging for Diagnosis and Prediction of Extension of Disease Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kido, K. Togashi, T. Koyama, T. Yamaoka, T. Fujiwara, and S. Fujii Diffusely Enlarged Uterus: Evaluation with MR Imaging RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1423 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Jha, J. Takahama, I. Imaoka, S. J. Korangy, J. B. Spies, C. Cooper, and S. M. Ascher Adenomyosis: MRI of the Uterus Treated with Uterine Artery Embolization Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 851 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Dudiak Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 151 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Hulka, D. A. Hall, K. McCarthy, and J. Simeone Sonographic Findings in Patients with Adenomyosis: Can Sonography Assist in Predicting Extent of Disease? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 379 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bazot, A. Cortez, E. Darai, J. Rouger, J. Chopier, J.-M. Antoine, and S. Uzan Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2427 - 2433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Masui, M. Katayama, S. Kobayashi, S. Nakayama, A. Nozaki, H. Kabasawa, T. Ito, and H. Sakahara Changes in Myometrial and Junctional Zone Thickness and Signal Intensity: Demonstration with Kinematic T2-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 75 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takahashi, M. Okada, I. Imaoka, K. Sugimura, and K. Miyazaki Value of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting efficacy of GnRH analogue treatment for uterine leiomyoma Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1989 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Umaria and J F Olliff Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2001; 74(882): 556 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Reinhold, F. Tafazoli, A. Mehio, L. Wang, M. Atri, E. S. Siegelman, and L. Rohoman Uterine Adenomyosis: Endovaginal US and MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 147 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Byun, S. E. Kim, B. G. Choi, G. Y. Ko, S. E. Jung, and K. H. Choi Diffuse and Focal Adenomyosis: MR Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 161 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Murase, E. S. Siegelman, E. K. Outwater, L. A. Perez-Jaffe, and R. W. Tureck Uterine Leiomyomas: Histopathologic Features, MR Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1179 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |