Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yousem, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yousem, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.

Radiology, Vol 167, 331-334, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Crohn disease: perirectal and perianal findings at CT

DM Yousem, EK Fishman and B Jones
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205.

The computed tomographic scans of 200 consecutive patients with Crohn disease were studied to determine the frequency and patterns of perirectal and perianal involvement. In 163 patients (82%) abnormalities in the perirectal-perianal region were demonstrated; findings included inflammation of fat planes (73%), bowel wall thickening (30%), fistulas or sinus tracts (22%), and abscesses (14%). Fistulas or sinus tracts occurred with equal frequency above or below the level of the anterior symphysis pubis. Abscesses, rectal thickening, and inflammatory infiltration of fat occurred more than twice as often above the symphysis pubis. However, 37% of patients had manifestations of Crohn disease below the symphysis pubis, emphasizing the importance of extending scanning sequences to the perineum.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
B A MacKalski and C N Bernstein
New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease
Gut, May 1, 2006; 55(5): 733 - 741.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Halligan and J. Stoker
Imaging of fistula in ano.
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 18 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. B. Kruskal, R. A. Kane, and M. M. Morrin
Peroxide-enhanced Anal Endosonography: Technique, Image Interpretation, and Clinical Applications
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S173 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. H. Beets-Tan, G. L. Beets, A. G. van der Hoop, A. G. H. Kessels, R. F. A. Vliegen, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven
Preoperative MR Imaging of Anal Fistulas: Does It Really Help the Surgeon?
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 75 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Morris, J. A. Spencer, and N. S. Ambrose
MR Imaging Classification of Perianal Fistulas and Its Implications for Patient Management
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(3): 623 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.