Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reagan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Grassi, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reagan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Grassi, C. J.

Radiology, Vol 167, 409-413, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography

K Reagan, MA Bettman, J Finkelstein, P Ganz and CJ Grassi
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

A randomized, double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent (ioversol) was performed in 80 patients undergoing routine coronary angiography and left ventriculography. Its hemodynamic and electrocardiographic (ECG) effects were compared with those of a conventional ionic contrast agent (sodium meglumine diatrizoate). There were 40 patients in each group. The radiographic quality and incidence of adverse reactions were comparable for both agents. Following left ventriculography, there was a smaller decrease in systemic and left ventricular systolic blood pressure and a smaller increase in heart rate and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (P less than .05) with ioversol than with meglumine diatrizoate. There was also a slight decrease in cardiac output with ioversol at 1 and 3 minutes after left ventriculography, while meglumine diatrizoate produced a modest increase. In selective coronary angiography, the fall in diastolic blood pressure was also greater (P less than .05). The Q-T interval was more prolonged with meglumine diatrizoate. Ioversol appears to be both safe and efficacious for cardiac angiography, causing fewer and less severe hemodynamic and ECG alterations than meglumine diatrizoate.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.