Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Osterman, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, R. I., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Osterman, F. A., Jr

Radiology, Vol 168, 127-130, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Streamlining operation of an admitting service for interventional radiology

RI White Jr, DM Rizer, KR Shuman, EJ White, PE Adams, ML Kinnison, SE Mitchell and FA Osterman Jr
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore.

The authors describe how operations of an inpatient admitting service for interventional radiology were improved by developing a clinic and hiring a physician's assistant. The service, begun in 1982, was managed by a senior radiologist and fellows. Because of increasing admissions (from a mean of 52 per year in 1982-1985 to 110 per year in 1985-1987), a 1/2-day, twice-weekly clinic was created in 1985 to evaluate new patients and perform follow-up examinations. In 1986 a physician's assistant was hired to assist in the clinic and during patient admissions. Use of the clinic and physician's assistant streamlined patient flow and management during hospitalization. This resulted in a decrease in mean length of stay for patients undergoing angioplasty (from 3.74 days in 1982-1983 to 2.41 days in 1986-1987). This decrease means cost savings for the hospital under the prospective payment system. Other benefits include improved physician-patient relationships and follow-up, new patients for colleagues (15% of patients had anatomy unsuitable for interventional procedures and were referred to staff surgeons), and increased professional fees.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.