Radiology, Vol 168, 43-47, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Liver and abdominal screening in patients with cancer: CT versus MR imaging

JL Chezmar, WM Rumancik, AJ Megibow, DH Hulnick, RC Nelson and ME Bernardino
Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.

A prospective multiinstitutional study was performed to compare the ability of dynamic sequential contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT), delayed contrast material-enhanced CT, and two T1- weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequences (spin echo and inversion recovery) to demonstrate metastatic disease in the liver and abdomen in patients with cancer. All four techniques had comparable rates of hepatic lesion detection when compared individually or when the combined CT techniques were compared with the combined MR techniques. The sensitivity to hepatic disease was 96% (27 of 28 patients) for the combined MR techniques versus 93% (26 of 28 patients) for the combined CT techniques. However, CT was statistically superior in the detection of extrahepatic disease, with significant extrahepatic findings demonstrated by CT in only 12 of 59 patients (20%). For this reason, the authors continue to recommend CT in the initial screening of patients with cancer for upper abdominal metastatic disease.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V Trillet-Lenoir, G Freyer, P Kaemmerlen, A Fond, O Pellet, C Lombard-Bohas, J L Gaudin, G Lledo, R Mackiewicz, M C Gouttebel, et al. Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2002; 75(899): 903 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. N. Low, R. C. Semelka, S. Worawattanakul, G. D. Alzate, and J. S. Sigeti Extrahepatic Abdominal Imaging in Patients with Malignancy: Comparison of MR Imaging and Helical CT, with Subsequent Surgical Correlation Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 625 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text]