Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benson, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P. M.

Radiology, Vol 168, 7-12, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Improved prediction of intrauterine growth retardation with use of multiple parameters

CB Benson, SB Boswell, DL Brown, DH Saltzman and PM Doubilet
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

Several sonographic parameters have been proposed for predicting intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), but each has been shown to have a low positive predictive value. To predict IUGR more reliably, the authors developed a multiparameter approach based on sonographic and clinical data from 62 fetuses with IUGR and 91 normal fetuses. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the combination of sonographically estimated fetal weight, amniotic fluid volume, and maternal blood pressure status best correlates with the presence or absence of IUGR and produced an IUGR scoring system based on these three parameters. The scoring system, which has a range of 0-100, was tested on a second set of fetuses (47 with IUGR, 81 normal) to determine its performance characteristics. An IUGR score below 50 virtually excludes the diagnosis of IUGR (0.9% likelihood of IUGR, or negative predictive value of 99.1%). A score above 75 allows confident diagnosis of IUGR (positive predictive value, 82%). A score of 50-75 is equivocal, in that it is associated with an intermediate (24%) likelihood of IUGR. The IUGR score is a practical tool that can be easily used in any ultrasound facility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. A. Detre, L. Maccotta, D. King, D. C. Alsop, G. Glosser, M. D'Esposito, E. Zarahn, G. K. Aguirre, and J. A. French
Functional MRI lateralization of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy
Neurology, April 1, 1998; 50(4): 926 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Plazzi, P. Montagna, F. Provini, A. Bizzi, M. Cohen, and E. Lugaresi
Pontine lesions in idiopathic narcolepsy
Neurology, May 1, 1996; 46(5): 1250 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.