Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohtomo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Iio, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohtomo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Iio, M.

Radiology, Vol 168, 621-623, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with MR imaging. Efficacy of T2 values at 0.35 and 1.5 T

K Ohtomo, Y Itai, K Yoshikawa, T Kokubo and M Iio
Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo, Japan.

Seventy-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma) and 56 with hemangioma were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.35 or 1.5 T to evaluate the efficacy of T2 values in differential diagnosis. T2 values were calculated with the two-point method. The mean T2 values of hepatoma and hemangioma were 58.9 msec +/- 8.9 and 101.6 msec +/- 25.8 at 0.35 T and 49.1 msec +/- 9.8 and 85.3 msec +/- 21.2 at 1.5 T. The difference in the T2 values for hepatoma and hemangioma was statistically significant (P less than .001) at both 0.35 and 1.5 T. Fifty-three of 56 lesions (94.6%) at 0.35 T and 86 of 102 lesions (84.3%) at 1.5 T were correctly classified when the T2 borderline between hepatoma and hemangioma was set at 80 msec. All misdiagnosed lesions were hemangioma, and all but one were smaller than 2 cm. However, over 90% of lesions smaller than 2 cm were correctly diagnosed when 70 msec at 0.35 T and 60 msec at 1.5 T were used as borderline T2 values. MR imaging with T2 measurement was very useful for differentiating between hepatoma and hemangioma (including small lesions) at 1.5 T as well as at 0.35 T.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. V. Sahani and S. P. Kalva
Imaging the Liver
Oncologist, July 1, 2004; 9(4): 385 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Horton, D. A. Bluemke, R. H. Hruban, P. Soyer, and E. K. Fishman
CT and MR Imaging of Benign Hepatic and Biliary Tumors
RadioGraphics, March 1, 1999; 19(2): 431 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.