|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 168, 621-623, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
K Ohtomo, Y Itai, K Yoshikawa, T Kokubo and M Iio
Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Seventy-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma) and 56 with hemangioma were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.35 or 1.5 T to evaluate the efficacy of T2 values in differential diagnosis. T2 values were calculated with the two-point method. The mean T2 values of hepatoma and hemangioma were 58.9 msec +/- 8.9 and 101.6 msec +/- 25.8 at 0.35 T and 49.1 msec +/- 9.8 and 85.3 msec +/- 21.2 at 1.5 T. The difference in the T2 values for hepatoma and hemangioma was statistically significant (P less than .001) at both 0.35 and 1.5 T. Fifty-three of 56 lesions (94.6%) at 0.35 T and 86 of 102 lesions (84.3%) at 1.5 T were correctly classified when the T2 borderline between hepatoma and hemangioma was set at 80 msec. All misdiagnosed lesions were hemangioma, and all but one were smaller than 2 cm. However, over 90% of lesions smaller than 2 cm were correctly diagnosed when 70 msec at 0.35 T and 60 msec at 1.5 T were used as borderline T2 values. MR imaging with T2 measurement was very useful for differentiating between hepatoma and hemangioma (including small lesions) at 1.5 T as well as at 0.35 T.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. V. Sahani and S. P. Kalva Imaging the Liver Oncologist, July 1, 2004; 9(4): 385 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Horton, D. A. Bluemke, R. H. Hruban, P. Soyer, and E. K. Fishman CT and MR Imaging of Benign Hepatic and Biliary Tumors RadioGraphics, March 1, 1999; 19(2): 431 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |