Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, K
Right arrow Articles by Matsuura, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, K
Right arrow Articles by Matsuura, K

Radiology, Vol 178, 363-367, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media

K Yamaguchi, H Katayama, T Takashima, T Kozuka, P Seez and K Matsuura
Department of Radiology, Yamagata University, Japan.

In a nationwide prospective study of adverse reactions to intravenous contrast media (CM), the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media compared high-osmolar ionic CM with low-osmolar nonionic CM. A total of 337,647 cases were analyzed. The reliability of pretesting with an intravenous injection of a small amount of CM as a means of predicting severe or fatal reactions was also evaluated. The predictive values of the pretest were 1.2% for ionic and 0.0% for nonionic CM, and the sensitivity values were 3.7% and 0.0%, respectively. Such low values render this test meaningless for predicting which patients are at risk of a severe adverse reaction. A comparison of the incidence of severe adverse reactions between the nonpretested and pretested patients, as well as between the nonpretested and pretested patients with negative results, disclosed no statistically significant differences. Also, no beneficial effects of premedication in patients with a positive pretest were proved. The authors therefore conclude that pretesting with an intravenous injection of a small amount of CM is not useful in predicting severe reactions to ionic or nonionic CM.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S K Morcos
Acute serious and fatal reactions to contrast media: our current understanding
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2005; 78(932): 686 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Sendo, M. Hirakawa, K. Fujie, Y. Kataoka, and R. Oishi
Contrast Medium–induced Pulmonary Edema Is Aggravated by Silicone Contamination in Rats
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.