Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tio, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tytgat, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tio, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tytgat, G.

Radiology, Vol 179, 165-170, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Colorectal carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonography

TL Tio, PP Coene, OM van Delden and GN Tytgat
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Transcolorectal endosonography (TES) with use of both a nonoptic instrument and an echocolonoscope was performed in 91 patients with colorectal carcinomas (61 rectal and 30 colonic). Correlation of results at TES with results of histologic analysis of resected specimens according to the 1987 TNM classification demonstrated that TES allowed accurate staging of all tumors except T2 carcinomas, which were often accompanied by peritumoral inflammation or abscesses. Overall, the accuracy of staging rectal and colonic carcinomas with TES was 81% and 93%, respectively; overstaging occurred in 13% and understaging in 2%. For regional lymph nodes, the accuracy of staging with TES was 70%, the sensitivity was 94%, and the specificity was 55%. Correlations between findings at TES and the Dukes classification were as follows: for rectal carcinoma, 48% for class A, 50% for class B, and 96% for class C; for colonic carcinoma, 67% for class A, 46% for class B, and 91% for class C. Overall accuracy was 67%. With the addition of abdominal computed tomographic or ultrasonographic examinations to evaluate distant metastases, TES should become an important imaging technique for clinical TNM staging of colorectal carcinomas.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. R. Muthusamy and K. J. Chang
Optimal Methods for Staging Rectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6877s - 6884s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim
Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. H. Beets-Tan and G. L. Beets
Rectal Cancer: Review with Emphasis on MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 335 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Kim, H. K. Lim, S. J. Lee, D. Choi, W. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, M. J. Kim, and J. H. Lim
Depiction and Local Staging of Rectal Tumors: Comparison of Transrectal US before and after Water Instillation
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
S. Dorudi, R. J. Steele, and C. S McArdle
Surgery for colorectal cancer
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 101 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Akahoshi, S Yoshinaga, A Soejima, T Nagaie, N Koyanagi, K Nakanishi, N Harada, and H Nawata
Transit endoscopic ultrasound of colorectal cancer using a 12 MHz catheter probe
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2001; 74(887): 1017 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A H Freeman
CT and bowel disease
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(877): 4 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Urban, H. R. Rosen, N. Hölbling, W. Feil, G. Hochwarther, W. Hruby, and R. Schiessel
MR Imaging for the Preoperative Planning of Sphincter-saving Surgery for Tumors of the Lower Third of the Rectum: Use of Intravenous and Endorectal Contrast Materials
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Kruskal, S. M. Sentovich, and R. A. Kane
Staging of Rectal Cancer after Polypectomy: Usefulness of Endorectal US
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 31 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.