|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 179, 165-170, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
TL Tio, PP Coene, OM van Delden and GN Tytgat
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Transcolorectal endosonography (TES) with use of both a nonoptic instrument and an echocolonoscope was performed in 91 patients with colorectal carcinomas (61 rectal and 30 colonic). Correlation of results at TES with results of histologic analysis of resected specimens according to the 1987 TNM classification demonstrated that TES allowed accurate staging of all tumors except T2 carcinomas, which were often accompanied by peritumoral inflammation or abscesses. Overall, the accuracy of staging rectal and colonic carcinomas with TES was 81% and 93%, respectively; overstaging occurred in 13% and understaging in 2%. For regional lymph nodes, the accuracy of staging with TES was 70%, the sensitivity was 94%, and the specificity was 55%. Correlations between findings at TES and the Dukes classification were as follows: for rectal carcinoma, 48% for class A, 50% for class B, and 96% for class C; for colonic carcinoma, 67% for class A, 46% for class B, and 91% for class C. Overall accuracy was 67%. With the addition of abdominal computed tomographic or ultrasonographic examinations to evaluate distant metastases, TES should become an important imaging technique for clinical TNM staging of colorectal carcinomas.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. R. Muthusamy and K. J. Chang Optimal Methods for Staging Rectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6877s - 6884s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. H. Beets-Tan and G. L. Beets Rectal Cancer: Review with Emphasis on MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 335 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, H. K. Lim, S. J. Lee, D. Choi, W. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, M. J. Kim, and J. H. Lim Depiction and Local Staging of Rectal Tumors: Comparison of Transrectal US before and after Water Instillation Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 117 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dorudi, R. J. Steele, and C. S McArdle Surgery for colorectal cancer Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 101 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Akahoshi, S Yoshinaga, A Soejima, T Nagaie, N Koyanagi, K Nakanishi, N Harada, and H Nawata Transit endoscopic ultrasound of colorectal cancer using a 12 MHz catheter probe Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2001; 74(887): 1017 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A H Freeman CT and bowel disease Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(877): 4 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Urban, H. R. Rosen, N. Hölbling, W. Feil, G. Hochwarther, W. Hruby, and R. Schiessel MR Imaging for the Preoperative Planning of Sphincter-saving Surgery for Tumors of the Lower Third of the Rectum: Use of Intravenous and Endorectal Contrast Materials Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 503 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Kruskal, S. M. Sentovich, and R. A. Kane Staging of Rectal Cancer after Polypectomy: Usefulness of Endorectal US Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 31 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |