Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Farley, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Farley, T. E.

Radiology, Vol 179, 639-643, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Unimpinged and impinged anterior cruciate ligament grafts: MR signal intensity measurements

SM Howell, GS Berns and TE Farley
Department of Orthopedics, David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Calif.

Regionalized magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensities were quantitatively measured in impinged and unimpinged anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts. Images were obtained with a 1.5-T imager, and signal intensity was measured in the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the graft. In 15 unimpinged ACL grafts, the signal intensity remained low and did not vary during the 1st year of graft implantation (45 images). In contrast, 17 impinged ACL grafts showed an increase in signal intensity in the distal two-thirds of the graft that persisted 1- 3 years after implantation (P less than .001). Unimpinged grafts were placed in tibial tunnels posterior and parallel to the slope of the intercondylar roof. Reconstructions with anterior tibial tunnels resulted in graft impingement that caused increases in graft signal intensity. This increase demonstrates a clear association between surgical technique and the subsequent MR appearance of the graft.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Saupe, L. M. White, M. M. Chiavaras, J. Essue, I. Weller, M. Kunz, M. Hurtig, and P. Marks
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Grafts: MR Imaging Features at Long-term Follow-up--Correlation with Functional and Clinical Evaluation
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 581 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. H. Brophy, J. E. Voos, F. J. Shannon, C. C. Granchi, T. L. Wickiewicz, R. F. Warren, and A. D. Pearle
Changes in the Length of Virtual Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibers During Stability Testing: A Comparison of Conventional Single-Bundle Reconstruction and Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2196 - 2203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Pearle, F. J. Shannon, C. Granchi, T. L. Wickiewicz, and R. F. Warren
Comparison of 3-Dimensional Obliquity and Anisometric Characteristics of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Positions Using Surgical Navigation
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1534 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. R. McCauley
MR Imaging Evaluation of the Postoperative Knee
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 53 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell and K. W. Lawhorn
Gravity Reduces the Tibia When Using a Tibial Guide That Targets the Intercondylar Roof
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1702 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. McCauley, A. Elfar, A. Moore, A. H. Haims, P. Jokl, J. K. Lynch, P. A. Ruwe, and L. D. Katz
MR Arthrography of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Grafts
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1217 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. P. Recht and J. Kramer
MR Imaging of the Postoperative Knee: A Pictorial Essay
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 765 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Weiler, G. Peters, J. Maurer, F. N. Unterhauser, and N. P. Sudkamp
Biomechanical Properties and Vascularity of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Can Be Predicted by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Study in Sheep
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2001; 29(6): 751 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. K. Horton, J. A. Jacobson, J. Lin, and C. W. Hayes
MR Imaging of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1091 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. M. Bradley, A. G. Bergman, and M. F. Dillingham
MR Imaging of Cyclops Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell, M. P. Wallace, M. L. Hull, and M. L. Deutsch
Evaluation of the Single-Incision Arthroscopic Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement: A Study of Tibial Tunnel Placement, Intraoperative Graft Tension, and Stability
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 284 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. C. S. M. HOWELL and C. M. A. TAYLOR
Brace-Free Rehabilitation, with Early Return to Activity, for Knees Reconstructed with a Double-Looped Semitendinosus and Gracilis Graft*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1996; 78(6): 814 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. M. Watanabe and S. M. Howell
Arthroscopic Findings Associated with Roof Impingement of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1995; 23(5): 616 - 625.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell and S. J. Barad
Knee Extension and its Relationship to the Slope of the Intercondylar Roof: Implications for Positioning the Tibial Tunnel in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1995; 23(3): 288 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell, K. E. Knox, T. E. Farley, and M. A. Taylor
Revascularization of a Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft During the First Two Years of Implantation
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1995; 23(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. M. Maywood, B. J. Murphy, J. W. Uribe, and K. S. Hechtman
Evaluation of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1993; 21(4): 523 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. S. Berns and S. M. Howell
Roofplasty requirements in vitro for different tibial hole placements in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1993; 21(2): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.