Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Modder, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Modder, U.

Radiology, Vol 180, 367-372, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Renal artery stenosis: preliminary results of treatment with the Strecker stent

FP Kuhn, B Kutkuhn, G Torsello and U Modder
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Dusseldorf, Germany.

Use of the Strecker flexible balloon-expandable tantalum stent for treatment of renal artery stenosis after failed angioplasty or transaortic thromboendarterectomy was evaluated in 10 patients (nine hypertensive, one normotensive). Left (n = 3) and right (n = 5) renal arteries were involved; renal artery stenosis in two patients had developed after kidney transplantation. Indications for stent placement were inadequate immediate postangioplasty response (n = 7), development of considerable restenosis after angioplasty (n = 1), and obstructing intimal flaps following transaortic endarterectomy (n = 2). Stent placement was technically successful (less than 20% residual stenosis) and patency was preserved in eight patients. Of the seven hypertensive patients with successful implantation, two were cured, three had improvement, and two had no change at latest follow-up evaluation (mean, 10.6 months; range, 6-12 months). The Strecker stent may be helpful in treating restenosis after failed revascularization procedures, although the precise indication, true safety, and long-term efficacy of stent placement in renal arteries will not be known until trials with more subjects and longer follow-up periods are completed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
G. J Dubel and T. P Murphy
The role of percutaneous revascularization for renal artery stenosis
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2008; 13(2): 141 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. H. Rundback, D. Sacks, K. C. Kent, C. Cooper, D. Jones, T. Murphy, K. Rosenfield, C. White, M. Bettmann, S. Cortell, et al.
Guidelines for the Reporting of Renal Artery Revascularization in Clinical Trials
Circulation, September 17, 2002; 106(12): 1572 - 1585.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Leertouwer, E. J. Gussenhoven, J. L. Bosch, B. C. van Jaarsveld, L. C. van Dijk, J. Deinum, and A. J. Man in 't Veld
Stent Placement for Renal Arterial Stenosis: Where Do We Stand? A Meta-analysis
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 78 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
QJMHome page
C.G. Isles, S. Robertson, and D. Hill
Management of renovascular disease: a review of renal artery stenting in ten studies
QJM, March 1, 1999; 92(3): 159 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Dorros, M. Jaff, L. Mathiak, I. I. Dorros, A. Lowe, K. Murphy, and T. He
Four-Year Follow-up of Palmaz-Schatz Stent Revascularization as Treatment for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis
Circulation, August 18, 1998; 98(7): 642 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
U. Blum, B. Krumme, P. Flugel, A. Gabelmann, T. Lehnert, C. Buitrago-Tellez, P. Schollmeyer, and M. Langer
Treatment of Ostial Renal-Artery Stenoses with Vascular Endoprostheses after Unsuccessful Balloon Angioplasty
N. Engl. J. Med., February 13, 1997; 336(7): 459 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.