Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semelka, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Laub, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Semelka, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Laub, G. A.

Radiology, Vol 180, 629-635, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

T1-weighted sequences for MR imaging of the liver: comparison of three techniques for single-breath, whole-volume acquisition at 1.0 and 1.5 T

RC Semelka, FC Simm, M Recht, M Deimling, G Lenz and GA Laub
Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

The authors compared three T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques that acquire images encompassing the entire liver in one breath hold. Twenty healthy volunteers were imaged--10 at 1.0 T and 10 at 1.5 T--and the results compared with those of regular short repetition time/echo time spin-echo imaging. Rapid acquisition spin echo was resistant to artifacts and had good image quality but had the lowest liver signal-to-noise (S/N) and spleen-liver signal-difference- to-noise (SD/N) values. Fast low-angle shot (FLASH) had the highest S/N and SD/N, very good image quality, and only mild artifacts. TurboFLASH had good S/N and SD/N, but reduced matrix size decreased image quality. All three sequences had better SD/N than regular spin echo, and FLASH and TurboFLASH had higher S/N. On the basis of this study, the FLASH sequence appears the most attractive for T1-weighted breath-hold imaging.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. M. Rofsky, V. S. Lee, G. Laub, M. A. Pollack, G. A. Krinsky, D. Thomasson, M. M. Ambrosino, and J. C. Weinreb
Abdominal MR Imaging with a Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 876 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. C. Semelka, N. C. Balci, B. O. de Beeck, and C. Reinhold
Evaluation of a 10-minute Comprehensive MR Imaging Examination of the Upper Abdomen
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.