Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.

Radiology, Vol 181, 669-673, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Current use of screening laboratory tests before abdominal interventions: a survey of 603 radiologists

SG Silverman, BF Coughlin, SE Seltzer, RG Swensson and PR Mueller
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

A survey of 2,153 radiologists was conducted to assess both their current practices of evaluating hemostatic function and their use of blood tests before performing image-guided nonvascular abdominal interventions. Among the 603 (28%) who responded, more radiologists routinely perform prothrombin time (81%) or partial thromboplastin time (78%) tests than platelet counts (59%), and relatively few (7%) obtain bleeding times. The most common practice (51%) is to order all of the first three tests. Use of laboratory tests is quite common (greater than 75%) before biopsy of splenic masses, hemangiomas, or hepatomas and before all catheter insertions. These tests are used less frequently (less than or equal to 70%) before fine-needle procedures, including biopsy and cyst aspiration. Only one-third of the radiologists alter their evaluation in patients who have taken aspirin. Most respondents (64%) believe that there should be written guidelines on how to evaluate patients before interventional procedures. Virtually all (97%) thought such evaluation should be the radiologist's responsibility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, C. M. Miller, and E. M. Merkle
Practice Patterns in Imaging of the Pregnant Patient with Abdominal Pain: A Survey of Academic Centers
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1128 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. A. Jaffe, R. C. Nelson, D. M. DeLong, and E. K. Paulson
Practice Patterns in Percutaneous Image-guided Intraabdominal Abscess Drainage: Survey of Academic and Private Practice Centers
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 750 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.