Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marmolya, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marmolya, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, A. C.

Radiology, Vol 181, 689-691, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT

G Marmolya, EJ Wiesen, R Yagan, CD Haria and AC Shah
Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

While computed tomography (CT) has become an important imaging modality in the evaluation of the paranasal sinuses, the radiation dose remains higher than is necessary. With use of a head phantom and constant kilovolt peak setting, axial and coronal CT scans of the paranasal sinuses were obtained at each of six successively lower milliampere second settings than are commonly used in clinical practice. Although noise, as measured by the standard deviation of the CT numbers, did increase, images were of diagnostic quality even when dose levels were reduced by a factor of 28. In the same incremental manner, the milliampere second settings used in scanning 90 patients were reduced, with no loss of diagnostic quality. The authors discuss the methods of analysis and the advantages of use of lower milliampere second settings at CT scanning of the sinuses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
R Olszewski, H Reychler, G Cosnard, J M Denis, S Vynckier, and F Zech
Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 37(5): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. H. Brem, A. A. Zamani, R. Riva, K. H. Zou, Z. Rumboldt, F. F. Hennig, R. Kikinis, A. M. Norbash, and U. J. Schoepf
Multidetector CT of the Paranasal Sinus: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 847 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. H. Mulkens, C. Broers, S. Fieuws, J.-L. Termote, and P. Bellnick
Comparison of Effective Doses for Low-Dose MDCT and Radiographic Examination of Sinuses in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1611 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. J. Fox
Use of the Lowest Necessary Radiation Dose
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 519 - 519.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini
Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, J. Widelec, V. De Maertelaer, J.-M. Bailly, C. Delcour, and P. A. Gevenois
Comparison Between Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Patients with Suspected Chronic Sinusitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 939 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
I Zammit-Maempel, C L Chadwick, and S P Willis
Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2003; 76(906): 418 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
T. Aalokken, T Hagtvedt, I Dalen, and A Kolbenstvedt
Conventional sinus radiography compared with CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 60 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. K. Kalra, S. Prasad, S. Saini, M. A. Blake, J. Varghese, E. F. Halpern, J. T. Rhea, and J. H. Thrall
Clinical Comparison of Standard-Dose and 50% Reduced--Dose Abdominal CT: Effect on Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S A Sohaib, P D Peppercorn, J A Horrocks, M H Keene, G S Kenyon, and R H Reznek
The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2001; 74(878): 157 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda, E. M. Scalzetti, and G. Levin
Technique Factors and Image Quality as Functions of Patient Weight at Abdominal CT
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.