Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berthezene, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Brasch, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berthezene, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Brasch, R. C.

Radiology, Vol 181, 773-777, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Differentiation of capillary leak and hydrostatic pulmonary edema with a macromolecular MR imaging contrast agent

Y Berthezene, V Vexler, H Jerome, R Sievers, ME Moseley and RC Brasch
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

The ability of a macromolecular contrast agent (polylysine- [gadopentetate dimeglumine]40) to allow distinction of pulmonary capillary leak from hydrostatic pulmonary edema was investigated. Capillary leak edema was induced in 12 rats by means of venous injection of oleic acid; hydrostatic pulmonary edema was induced in 10 rats by means of continuous infusion of 0.9% sodium chloride. In the oleic acid pulmonary edema model, the signal intensity continued to increase for 12 minutes after administration of contrast material, indicating a leak of paramagnetic molecules from the intravascular to the extravascular spaces. Conversely, lung enhancement remained virtually constant after injection of contrast material in the hydrostatic edema model, as would be expected in the absence of endothelial damage. Hydrostatic edema tended to be distributed homogeneously throughout the lung, while capillary leak edema tended to occur predominantly in the peripheral portions of the lung. These findings indicate that macromolecular contrast agents can facilitate differentiation between edema caused by elevated intravascular pressure and edema induced by abnormal capillary permeability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Biederer and M. Heller
Artificial Thorax for MR Imaging Studies in Porcine Heart-Lung Preparations
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 250 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. D. Caruthers, C. B. Paschal, N. A. Pou, R. J. Roselli, and T. R. Harris
Regional measurements of pulmonary edema by using magnetic resonance imaging
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 1998; 84(6): 2143 - 2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.