Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, E.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, E.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. W.

Radiology, Vol 187, 89-93, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Selective MR imaging of silicone with the three-point Dixon technique

E Schneider and TW Chan
Applied Science Laboratory, GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI 53188.

Selective magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of silicone with the three- point Dixon technique was evaluated. This technique, which conventionally allows separation of lipid and water signals, was modified to allow calculation of a silicone-only image and a lipid- water image. Imaging of fat and silicone implant phantoms was performed with a 1.5-T imager and was optimized in vivo in two volunteers who had breast reconstruction or augmentation. Six additional volunteers were then imaged to evaluate selective MR imaging of silicone. With an optimum frequency shift of 105 Hz, a repetition time of 1,000 msec, and an echo time of 28 msec, the modified three-point Dixon technique produced a silicone-only image containing 97.0% +/- 1.0 (standard deviation) of the total silicone signal, 2.6% +/- 0.5 of the fat signal, and 16.6% +/- 6.4 of the water signal. The silicone-fat contrast-to-noise ratio was 47.9 +/- 12.1. This method may be potentially useful in the evaluation of implant-related complications such as rupture.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.