Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v192,p583)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heiken, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by DiCroce, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heiken, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by DiCroce, J.

Radiology, Vol 187, 327-331, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols [published erratum appears in Radiology 1994 Aug;192(2):583]

JP Heiken, JA Brink, BL McClennan, SS Sagel, HP Forman and J DiCroce
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.

To determine the effect of contrast medium injection rate and biphasic versus uniphasic bolus on hepatic parenchymal enhancement at computed tomography (CT), 105 patients were randomized into four protocols. Hepatic and aortic enhancement curves were measured for each protocol. The optimal scanning interval (the duration between onset of a desired hepatic enhancement threshold and decline of enhancement below the threshold or onset of the equilibrium phase) and contrast enhancement index (CEI) (area under the hepatic enhancement curve above a desired threshold during the nonequilibrium phase) were the primary determinants of merit. Measurements were performed at hepatic enhancement thresholds between 10 and 60 HU. At most thresholds of hepatic enhancement, optimal scanning intervals were significantly longer and CEIs were significantly higher for the biphasic protocols than for the uniphasic protocols (P < .03). A biphasic injection with a high initial flow rate produces high peak contrast enhancement but delayed onset of equilibrium and thus provides a longer optimal scanning interval.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. T. Bae, A. J. Shah, S. S. Shang, J. H. Wang, S. Chang, M. Kanematsu, and C. F. Hildebolt
Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement with Abdominal 64-MDCT in Pediatric Patients: Effect of Body Weight and Iodine Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1589 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita
Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Furuta, K. Ito, T. Fujita, S. Koike, A. Shimizu, and N. Matsunaga
Hepatic Enhancement in Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced MDCT: Comparison of High- and Low-Iodine-Concentration Contrast Medium in Same Patients with Chronic Liver Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 157 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Takada, H. Onishi, and S. Hori
Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast: Analysis of the Effect of Different Concentrations of Contrast Material at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 757 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Lim, D. Choi, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, W. J. Lee, H. K. Lim, and S. Kim
Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Adding Delayed Phase Imaging to Dual-Phase Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Ji, J. D. McTavish, K. J. Mortele, W. Wiesner, and P. R. Ros
Hepatic Imaging with Multidetector CT
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. R. Herts, C. M. O'Malley, S. L. Wirth, M. L. Lieber, and B. Pohlman
Power Injection of Contrast Media Using Central Venous Catheters: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 447 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yamashita, Y. Komohara, M. Takahashi, M. Uchida, N. Hayabuchi, T. Shimizu, and I. Narabayashi
Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material-A Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 718 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. T. Bae, H. Q. Tran, and J. P. Heiken
Multiphasic Injection Method for Uniform Prolonged Vascular Enhancement at CT Angiography: Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Experimental Porcine Model
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 872 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. L. Hänninen, T. J. Vogl, R. Felfe, W. Pegios, J. Balzer, W. Clauss, and R. Felix
Detection of Focal Liver Lesions at Biphasic Spiral CT: Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Effect of Iodine Concentration in Contrast Materials
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 403 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros
CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. S. Gierada and K. T. Bae
Gadolinium as a CT Contrast Agent: Assessment in a Porcine Model
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 829 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, S. L. Cheng, T. L. Peters, and P. C. McGovern
Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.