Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hooshmand, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hooshmand, R.

Radiology, Vol 189, 411-416, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Prospective comparison of T2-weighted fast spin-echo, with and without fat suppression, and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences in the upper abdomen

LH Schwartz, SE Seltzer, CM Tempany, SG Silverman, DR Piwnica-Worms, DF Adams, L Herman, LT Herman and R Hooshmand
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

PURPOSE: To evaluate use of fast spin-echo (FSE) magnetic resonance imaging with and without fat suppression in the liver and upper abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional spin-echo (SE) T2- weighted, FSE T2-weighted, and fat-suppressed FSE T2-weighted images from 37 patients strongly suspected to have focal hepatic lesions were evaluated. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis demonstrated that fat- suppressed FSE imaging had the highest lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio; conventional SE imaging, the lowest. In a qualitative analysis, FSE imaging was preferred. In a rank order analysis, FSE imaging was preferred 83% of the time and fat-suppressed FSE imaging 17% of the time as regards overall image quality; fat-suppressed FSE imaging was preferred 64% of the time, FSE imaging 23% of the time, and conventional SE imaging 13% of the time as regards signal abnormality detection. CONCLUSION: FSE imaging with and without fat suppression is a potentially useful pulse sequence for evaluating the upper abdomen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, G. M. Choi, S. H. Kim, J. K. Park, B.-C. Song, and W. Kang
Comparison of Three Free-Breathing T2-Weighted MRI Sequences in the Evaluation of Focal Liver Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W19 - W27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. K. Kim, C. S. Kim, G. H. Chung, S. B. Jeon, and J. M. Lee
Feasibility of Application of Sensitivity Encoding to the Breath-Hold T2-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence for Evaluation of Focal Hepatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 497 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Lim, D. Choi, S. K. Cho, S. H. Kim, W. J. Lee, H. K. Lim, C. K. Park, S. W. Paik, and Y. I. Kim
Conspicuity of Hepatocellular Nodular Lesions in Cirrhotic Livers at Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging: Importance of Kupffer Cell Number
Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 669 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Y. Jeong, D. G. Mitchell, and G. A. Holland
Liver Lesion Conspicuity: T2-weighted Breath-hold Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging before and after Gadolinium Enhancement—Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 455 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Reimer, N. Jähnke, M. Fiebich, W. Schima, F. Deckers, C. Marx, N. Holzknecht, and S. Saini
Hepatic Lesion Detection and Characterization: Value of Nonenhanced MR Imaging, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging, and Spiral CT-ROC Analysis
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 152 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Hori, T. Murakami, T. Kim, M. Kanematsu, K. Tsuda, S. Takahashi, M. Takamura, H. Hoshi, and H. Nakamura
Single Breath-Hold T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Liver: Value of Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo and Multishot Spin-Echo Echoplanar Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1423 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros
CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, M. N. J. M. Wasser, M. E. J. Pijl, E. L. van Persijn van Meerten, J.-W. C. Gratama, and J. L. Bloem
Can Inversion-Recovery Gradient- and Spin-Echo T2-weighted MR Imaging Be an Alternative to Fast Spin-Echo Imaging with Fat Suppression? • Dr Wasser and colleagues respond:
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 291 - 291.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, and H. Nakamura
Focal Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of Four Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR Imaging Pulse Sequences
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.