Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levin, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harford, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levin, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harford, R. J.

Radiology, Vol 189, 753-757, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Cost containment in the use of low-osmolar contrast agents: effect of guidelines, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms

DC Levin, GA Gardiner Jr, S Karasick, GS Shaber, RJ Wechsler, GH McArdle, CD Lockard and RJ Harford
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

PURPOSE: To describe a program for controlling intravenous use of low- osmolar contrast agents (LOCAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The department of radiology at the authors' institution adopted a policy of selective use of intravenously administered LOCAs. Clinical indications for LOCA use were specified after consultation with the administration, risk managers, legal department, and ethics committee of the hospital. The guidelines were then publicized throughout the department and hospital, and a contrast agent data form was developed to collect data on all cases. Monitoring mechanisms were instituted. RESULTS: Over the next 23 months, 11,373 patients received intravenous iodinated contrast agents, of whom 28.1% were deemed to be at high risk and were given LOCAs. Monthly tracking showed no evidence of a trend toward increasing use of LOCAs. CONCLUSION: Clear definition of use guidelines, close monitoring, and feedback can stabilize LOCA use at acceptably low levels.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.