Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, G. D.

Radiology, Vol 190, 167-174, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Aortic cobwebs: an anatomic marker identifying the false lumen in aortic dissection--imaging and pathologic correlation

DM Williams, A Joshi, MD Dake, GM Deeb, DC Miller and GD Abrams
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030.

PURPOSE: To describe and estimate the frequency of fibroelastic cords or bands projecting from the false lumen wall ("aortic cobwebs") in acute and chronic dissections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathologic specimens (n = 23), routine magnetic resonance (MR) images (n = 27), and intravascular (n = 5) and transesophageal (n = 3) ultrasound (US) images from 43 patients with aortic dissection were reviewed, and the presence and configuration of cobwebs were noted. RESULTS: Aortic cobwebs usually bridge the junction of the dissection flap with the outer wall of the false lumen (the line of dissection) but occasionally project like small tendrils from the false lumen wall remote from the line of dissection. Cobwebs were found in 17 of 23 pathologic specimens and on six of 27 MR images, two of five intravascular US scans, and one of three transesophageal US scans. CONCLUSION: Aortic cobwebs most likely represent residual ribbons of media that have been incompletely sheared from the aortic wall during the dissection process. As such, they can serve as an anatomic marker of the false lumen. They are occasionally seen on routine aortic images and may, therefore, prove useful for orientation during percutaneous or surgical interventional procedures to relieve ischemic complications of aortic dissection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
W de Monye, M Murphy, R Hodgson, J Holemans, and R Mcwilliams
Acute aortic syndromes: pathology and imaging
Imaging, August 1, 2004; 16(3): 230 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Kapoor, J. V. Ferris, and C. R. Fuhrman
Intimomedial Rupture: A New CT Finding to Distinguish True from False Lumen in Aortic Dissection
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 109 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Castaner, M. Andreu, X. Gallardo, J. M. Mata, M. A. Cabezuelo, and Y. Pallardo
CT in Nontraumatic Acute Thoracic Aortic Disease: Typical and Atypical Features and Complications
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2003; 23(90001): S93 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. LePage, L. E. Quint, S. S. Sonnad, G. M. Deeb, and D. M. Williams
Aortic Dissection: CT Features that Distinguish True Lumen from False Lumen
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 207 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
J. T. Raymond, S. M. Skalina, M. D. Kerstein, and J.-R. Dupont
Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Dissections: Case Reports
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 1997; 31(1): 91 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.