|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 190, 363-369, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
JS Swan, TM Grist, DM Weber, IA Sproat and MM Wojtowycz
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, Madison 53792.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of an automated variable velocity- encoding sequence and improve the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) on magnetic resonance angiograms with use of phase contrast and a pelvic phased-array coil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cardiac-gated, two- dimensional (2D), phase-contrast (PC) sequences were evaluated in 10 healthy subjects. A 2D gated PC sequence with variable velocity encoding (velocity-optimized phase contrast [VOPC]) was compared with gated 2D PC sequences performed with high or low constant velocity encoding. S/Ns in VOPC images obtained with a pelvic phased-array coil were compared with those in VOPC images obtained with a body coil. RESULTS: Two blinded readers preferred VOPC for simultaneous display of large and small blood vessels in one acquisition compared with constant low (P = .0105) and high (P = .0067) velocity encoding and for overall image interpretation. VOPC images obtained with the pelvic coil had a 68%-100% better S/N compared with those obtained with the body coil. CONCLUSION: Use of a phased-array coil and variable velocity encoding improves depiction of segmental vascular anatomic structures of the pelvis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. Lum, K. M. Johnson, R. K. Paul, A. S. Turk, D. W. Consigny, J. R. Grinde, C. A. Mistretta, and T. M. Grist Transstenotic Pressure Gradients: Measurement in Swine Retrospectively ECG-gated 3D Phase-Contrast MR Angiography versus Endovascular Pressure-sensing Guidewires Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 751 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ringgaard, S. A. Oyre, and E. M. Pedersen Arterial MR Imaging Phase-Contrast Flow Measurement: Improvements with Varying Velocity Sensitivity during Cardiac Cycle Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 289 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Rofsky and M. A. Adelman MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 325 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, T. Ishimori, K. Oda, T. Hayashi, A. Hiyama, and Y. Dodo Dynamic Subtraction Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 135 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |