|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 190, 683-687, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
IR Kamel, RJ Hernandez, JE Martin, AE Schlesinger, LT Niklason and KE Guire
Department of Radiological Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.
PURPOSE: To determine whether a lower radiation dose technique can be used for computed tomography (CT) of the pediatric pelvis without significant loss of diagnostic image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six pediatric patients underwent CT at 80 mAs (experimental group), and 42 underwent CT at 240 mAs (control group). Anatomic details, image quality, and the degree of confidence in reaching a diagnosis were graded on a scale of 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent). RESULTS: The difference in perceived image quality between the experimental and control groups was not statistically significant. The mean scores for scans evaluated by the first reader were 3.88 for the experimental group and 3.92 for the control group (P = .2804). The mean scores for the second reader were 3.78 and 3.77 for the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = .8131). CONCLUSION: A substantial dose reduction can be achieved if pelvic CT is performed at 80 mAs, without a recognizable deterioration of diagnostic image quality.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Herzog, D. M. Mulvihill, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, B. Schmidt, P. Costello, T. J. Vogl, and U. J. Schoepf Pediatric Cardiovascular CT Angiography: Radiation Dose Reduction Using Automatic Anatomic Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1232 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Fefferman, E. Bomsztyk, A. M. Yim, R. Rivera, J. B. Amodio, L. P. Pinkney, N. A. Strubel, M. E. Noz, and H. Rusinek Appendicitis in Children: Low-Dose CT with a Phantom-based Simulation Technique--Initial Observations Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 641 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Siegel, B. Schmidt, D. Bradley, C. Suess, and C. Hildebolt Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric CT: Effect of Technical Factors and Phantom Size and Shape Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 515 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Pages, N Buls, and M Osteaux CT doses in children: a multicentre study Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 76(911): 803 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Heneghan, K. A. McGuire, R. A. Leder, D. M. DeLong, T. Yoshizumi, and R. C. Nelson Helical CT for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis: Comparison of Conventional and Reduced Radiation-Dose Techniques Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 575 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Boone, E. M. Geraghty, J. A. Seibert, and S. L. Wootton-Gorges Dose Reduction in Pediatric CT: A Rational Approach Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 352 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Fricke, L. F. Donnelly, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, V. Varchena, S. A. Poe, and J. Lucaya In-Plane Bismuth Breast Shields for Pediatric CT: Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality Using Experimental and Clinical Data Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 407 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. McNitt-Gray AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Radiation Dose in CT RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1541 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Frush, B. Soden, K. S. Frush, and C. Lowry Improved Pediatric Multidetector Body CT Using a Size-Based Color-Coded Format Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 721 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 289 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Donnelly, K. H. Emery, A. S. Brody, T. Laor, V. M. Gylys-Morin, C. G. Anton, S. R. Thomas, and D. P. Frush Minimizing Radiation Dose for Pediatric Body Applications of Single-Detector Helical CT: Strategies at a Large Children's Hospital Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 303 - 306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Huda, E. M. Scalzetti, and G. Levin Technique Factors and Image Quality as Functions of Patient Weight at Abdominal CT Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 430 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |