Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnall, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kressel, H. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schnall, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kressel, H. Y.

Radiology, Vol 190, 709-714, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings

MD Schnall, EE Furth, EF Rosato and HY Kressel
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

PURPOSE: To develop magnetic resonance (MR) imaging criteria for staging rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with rectal tumors underwent MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. MR images were compared with specimens from the resected tumor. RESULTS: Rectal wall layers were reliably demonstrated. The MR imaging- determined tumor stage agreed with pathologic findings in 81% of cases. A retrospective review found the integrity of the rectal wall layers at the lesion center an accurate criterion for interpreting the local extent of the lesion. Lymph nodes as small as 2 mm were demonstrated. Although sensitive for demonstrating perirectal adenopathy, MR imaging had a specificity of only 72% for N1 disease. CONCLUSION: Endorectal surface coil MR imaging shows promise for staging rectal lesions. Additional studies are necessary to further establish criteria for interpreting the images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. R. Muthusamy and K. J. Chang
Optimal Methods for Staging Rectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6877s - 6884s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Y. Ko, H. K. Ha, A. Y. Kim, K. H. Yoon, C. S. Yoo, H. C. Kim, and J. C. Kim
CT Differentiation of Mucinous and Nonmucinous Colorectal Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 785 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim
Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. P. Dhamanaskar, W. Thurston, and S. R. Wilson
Transvaginal sonography as an adjunct to endorectal sonography in the staging of rectal cancer in women.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 90 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. Iafrate, A. Laghi, P. Paolantonio, M. Rengo, P. Mercantini, M. Ferri, V. Ziparo, and R. Passariello
Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MR Imaging: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 701 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G Brown, I R Daniels, C Richardson, P Revell, D Peppercorn, and M Bourne
Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 245 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Akasu, G. Iinuma, T. Fujita, Y. Muramatsu, U. Tateishi, K. Miyakawa, T. Murakami, and N. Moriyama
Thin-Section MRI with a Phased-Array Coil for Preoperative Evaluation of Pelvic Anatomy and Tumor Extent in Patients with Rectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 531 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, A. S. Glas, F. J. M. Slors, A. H. Zwinderman, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker
Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging--A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 773 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. H. Beets-Tan and G. L. Beets
Rectal Cancer: Review with Emphasis on MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 335 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Blomqvist and G. Brown
Colorectal Cancer Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1600 - 1601.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Filippone, R. Ambrosini, M. Fuschi, T. Marinelli, D. Genovesi, and L. Bonomo
Preoperative T and N Staging of Colorectal Cancer: Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography--Initial Experience
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. J. Telford, J. R. Saltzman, K. M. Kuntz, and S. Syngal
Impact of Preoperative Staging and Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 191 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. H. Fuchsjager, A. G. Maier, W. Schima, E. Zebedin, F. Herbst, M. Mittlbock, F. Wrba, and G. L. Lechner
Comparison of Transrectal Sonography and Double-Contrast MR Imaging When Staging Rectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Low, S. C. Chen, and R. Barone
Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Patients with Malignancy: Findings at MR Imaging
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 157 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Brown, C. J. Richards, M. W. Bourne, R. G. Newcombe, A. G. Radcliffe, N. S. Dallimore, and G. T. Williams
Morphologic Predictors of Lymph Node Status in Rectal Cancer with Use of High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging with Histopathologic Comparison
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 371 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson
New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. Gagliardi, S. Bayar, R. Smith, and R. R. Salem
Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging With External Phase-Arrayed Coils
Arch Surg, April 1, 2002; 137(4): 447 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Urban, H. R. Rosen, N. Hölbling, W. Feil, G. Hochwarther, W. Hruby, and R. Schiessel
MR Imaging for the Preoperative Planning of Sphincter-saving Surgery for Tumors of the Lower Third of the Rectum: Use of Intravenous and Endorectal Contrast Materials
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. Hussain, E. K. Outwater, and E. S. Siegelman
Mucinous versus Nonmucinous Rectal Carcinomas: Differentiation with MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Kruskal, S. M. Sentovich, and R. A. Kane
Staging of Rectal Cancer after Polypectomy: Usefulness of Endorectal US
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 31 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Brown, C. J. Richards, R. G. Newcombe, N. S. Dallimore, A. G. Radcliffe, D. P. Carey, M. W. Bourne, and G. T. Williams
Rectal Carcinoma: Thin-Section MR Imaging for Staging in 28 Patients
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 215 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Stoker, E. Rociu, A. W. Zwamborn, W. R. Schouten, and J. S. Lameris
Endoluminal MR Imaging of the Rectum and Anus: Technique, Applications, and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, March 1, 1999; 19(2): 383 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.