Radiology, Vol 190, 715-720, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary

FJ Hulsmans, TL Tio, P Fockens, A Bosma and GN Tytgat
Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To assess the depth of infiltration of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound (US) (TRUS) and analyze interpretation errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent TRUS were prospectively studied. The effect of different patient inclusion criteria and US criteria was evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Extensive overstaging of T2 tumors, partially caused by inflammatory (desmoplastic) reaction or retraction of the muscularis propria, resulted in a specificity of only 24% for detection of perirectal infiltration. Sensitivity was 97%, and accuracy was 64%. Considerable variation in staging accuracy was observed when different patient selection criteria were used. Variation of US criteria improved differentiation between T2 and T3 tumors only slightly. CONCLUSION: The effect of different US criteria on differentiation of T2 and T3 tumors is limited. Spontaneous or iatrogenic inflammation is a major limiting factor. The accuracy of TRUS in staging rectal cancer is affected by patient inclusion criteria.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Engin Endosonographic imaging of anorectal diseases. J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 57 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Akasu, G. Iinuma, T. Fujita, Y. Muramatsu, U. Tateishi, K. Miyakawa, T. Murakami, and N. Moriyama Thin-Section MRI with a Phased-Array Coil for Preoperative Evaluation of Pelvic Anatomy and Tumor Extent in Patients with Rectal Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 531 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bipat, A. S. Glas, F. J. M. Slors, A. H. Zwinderman, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging--A Meta-Analysis Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 773 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. H. Beets-Tan and G. L. Beets Rectal Cancer: Review with Emphasis on MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 335 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Filippone, R. Ambrosini, M. Fuschi, T. Marinelli, D. Genovesi, and L. Bonomo Preoperative T and N Staging of Colorectal Cancer: Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography--Initial Experience Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 83 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kim, H. K. Lim, S. J. Lee, D. Choi, W. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, M. J. Kim, and J. H. Lim Depiction and Local Staging of Rectal Tumors: Comparison of Transrectal US before and after Water Instillation Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 117 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Telford, J. R. Saltzman, K. M. Kuntz, and S. Syngal Impact of Preoperative Staging and Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 191 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Fuchsjager, A. G. Maier, W. Schima, E. Zebedin, F. Herbst, M. Mittlbock, F. Wrba, and G. L. Lechner Comparison of Transrectal Sonography and Double-Contrast MR Imaging When Staging Rectal Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Akahoshi, S Yoshinaga, A Soejima, T Nagaie, N Koyanagi, K Nakanishi, N Harada, and H Nawata Transit endoscopic ultrasound of colorectal cancer using a 12 MHz catheter probe Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2001; 74(887): 1017 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Urban, H. R. Rosen, N. Hölbling, W. Feil, G. Hochwarther, W. Hruby, and R. Schiessel MR Imaging for the Preoperative Planning of Sphincter-saving Surgery for Tumors of the Lower Third of the Rectum: Use of Intravenous and Endorectal Contrast Materials Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 503 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. B. Kruskal, S. M. Sentovich, and R. A. Kane Staging of Rectal Cancer after Polypectomy: Usefulness of Endorectal US Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 31 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Brown, C. J. Richards, R. G. Newcombe, N. S. Dallimore, A. G. Radcliffe, D. P. Carey, M. W. Bourne, and G. T. Williams Rectal Carcinoma: Thin-Section MR Imaging for Staging in 28 Patients Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text]