Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ascher, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ascher, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J. A.

Radiology, Vol 190, 803-806, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography

SM Ascher, LL Arnold, RH Patt, JJ Schruefer, AS Bagley, RC Semelka, RK Zeman and JA Simon
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare conventional spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty women with clinically suspected adenomyosis underwent MR imaging and transvaginal sonography performed within 3 months of each other. Pathologic proof was obtained in all cases. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were proved to have adenomyosis. The correct diagnosis was achieved with MR imaging in 15 of 17 cases. One false-positive and two false-negative diagnoses were made with MR imaging. With transvaginal sonography, nine of 17 cases of adenomyosis were correctly diagnosed. One false-positive and eight false-negative diagnoses occurred. The most frequent cause of false- negative diagnoses with transvaginal sonography was the misinterpretation of adenomyosis as leiomyomas (seven cases). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is significantly better (P < .02) than transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. D. Kim, S. Kim, N. K. Kim, M. H. Lee, E. H. Ahn, H. J. Kim, J. H. Cho, and S. H. Cha
Long-Term Results of Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 176 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. Spielmann, C. Keogh, B. B. Forster, M. L. Martin, and L. S. Machan
Comparison of MRI and sonography in the preliminary evaluation for fibroid embolization.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Chopra, A. S. Lev-Toaff, F. Ors, and D. Bergin
Adenomyosis:common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Rabinovici, Y. Inbar, S.C. Eylon, E. Schiff, A. Hananel, and D. Freundlich
Pregnancy and live birth after focused ultrasound surgery for symptomatic focal adenomyosis: a case report
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1255 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Ghai, D. K. Rajan, M. S. Benjamin, M. R. Asch, and S. Ghai
Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomas: Pre- and Postprocedural Evaluation with US
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1159 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-P. Pelage, D. Jacob, A. Fazel, J. Namur, A. Laurent, R. Rymer, and O. Le Dref
Midterm Results of Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 948 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. Tamai, K. Togashi, T. Ito, N. Morisawa, T. Fujiwara, and T. Koyama
MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 21 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Imaoka, A. Wada, M. Matsuo, M. Yoshida, H. Kitagaki, and K. Sugimura
MR Imaging of Disorders Associated with Female Infertility: Use in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1401 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Jha, J. Takahama, I. Imaoka, S. J. Korangy, J. B. Spies, C. Cooper, and S. M. Ascher
Adenomyosis: MRI of the Uterus Treated with Uterine Artery Embolization
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 851 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Bazot, E. Darai, S. C. de Givry, F. Boudghene, S. Uzan, and A. F. Le Blanche
Fast Breath-Hold T2-Weighted MR Imaging Reduces Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1291 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Masui, M. Katayama, S. Kobayashi, S. Shimizu, A. Nozaki, and H. Sakahara
Pseudolesions Related to Uterine Contraction: Characterization with Multiphase-Multisection T2-weighted MR Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A. Hulka, D. A. Hall, K. McCarthy, and J. Simeone
Sonographic Findings in Patients with Adenomyosis: Can Sonography Assist in Predicting Extent of Disease?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 379 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. L. Bennett, C. M. Slywotzky, and G. Giovanniello
Gynecologic Causes of Acute Pelvic Pain: Spectrum of CT Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 785 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. McLucas, R. Perrella, S. Goodwin, L. Adler, and J. Dalrymple
Role of Uterine Artery Doppler Flow in Fibroid Embolization
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Bergholt, L. Eriksen, N. Berendt, M. Jacobsen, and J.B. Hertz
Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2418 - 2421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bazot, A. Cortez, E. Darai, J. Rouger, J. Chopier, J.-M. Antoine, and S. Uzan
Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2427 - 2433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Atri, C. Reinhold, A. R. Mehio, W. B. Chapman, and P. M. Bret
Adenomyosis: US Features with Histologic Correlation in an in Vitro Study
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Kunz, D. Beil, P. Huppert, and G. Leyendecker
Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. E. Frye, S. M. Ascher, and D. Thomasson
MR Hysterosalpingography: Protocol Development and Refinement for Simulating Normal and Abnormal Fallopian Tube Patency-Feasibility Study with a Phantom1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Reinhold, F. Tafazoli, A. Mehio, L. Wang, M. Atri, E. S. Siegelman, and L. Rohoman
Uterine Adenomyosis: Endovaginal US and MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 147 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.