Radiology, Vol 191, 119-122, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Sequential viewing of abdominal CT images at varying rates

D Gur, WF Good, JH Oliver, FL Thaete, RL Baron, MP Federle, WL Campbell and MS Rosenthal
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261-0001.

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiologists' ability to detect abdominal masses during sequential viewing of series of computed tomographic (CT) scans at varying rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the ability of five experienced radiologists to determine the presence or absence of subtle abdominal masses in 29 cases (15 positive, 14 negative) while viewing CT scans sequentially at different rates (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, and 21 images per second) and also at reader-selectable rates. RESULTS: Even at extremely fast viewing rates (21 images per second), radiologists performed significantly better (P < .05) than would be expected by chance alone (average area Az under the ROC curve = 0.73 vs 0.5). As the viewing rate decreased, their performance increased. The reader- selectable mode was better than any fixed-rate cine mode (average Az = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Fixed-rate sequential viewing of CT images for the primary diagnosis of subtle abdominal masses should be restricted to no more than one or two images per second, but the reader-selectable viewing mode is preferable to any fixed-rate cine mode.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Johnson Hard- versus Soft-Copy Interpretation Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 629 - 630. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. J. Pijl, M. N. J. M. Wasser, E. C. Joekes, C. J. H. van de Velde, and J. L. Bloem Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma: Comparison of Soft- and Hard-Copy Helical CT Interpretation Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 747 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]