Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assoun, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnevialle, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assoun, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnevialle, P.

Radiology, Vol 191, 217-223, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging versus CT

J Assoun, G Richardi, JJ Railhac, C Baunin, P Fajadet, J Giron, P Maquin, J Haddad and P Bonnevialle
Department of Radiology, CHU Toulouse Purpan, France.

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with histologically proved osteoid osteoma underwent CT and MR imaging before excision of the lesion. CT and MR images were compared regarding lesion conspicuity and detection of marrow, soft-tissue, and/or synovial changes adjacent to the primary lesion. RESULTS: CT was more accurate than MR imaging in detection of the osteoid osteoma nidus in 63% of cases. MR imaging was better than CT in showing intramedullary and soft-tissue changes in all cases. This may produce a misleading aggressive appearance on MR images. There was a statistically significant correlation between presence or absence of marrow or soft-tissue changes and treatment with antiinflammatory medications (P < .05). CONCLUSION: CT remains the best imaging modality for diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. MR images should not be interpreted without reference to plain radiographs and CT scans if serious errors in diagnosis are to be avoided.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
M. H. Rodallec, A. Feydy, F. Larousserie, P. Anract, R. Campagna, A. Babinet, M. Zins, and J.-L. Drape
Diagnostic Imaging of Solitary Tumors of the Spine: What to Do and Say
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1019 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
T. T. Miller
Bone Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions: Analysis with Conventional Radiography
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 662 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
F. Abnousi, J. D. Saliman, and G. S. Fanton
Arthroscopic Visualization and Assisted Excision of Osteoid Osteoma at the Knee: A Case Report and Review
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 375 - 378.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ImagingHome page
J Teh
Imaging the hip
Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 234 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
A. Gangi, H. Alizadeh, L. Wong, X. Buy, J.-L. Dietemann, and C. Roy
Osteoid Osteoma: Percutaneous Laser Ablation and Follow-up in 114 Patients
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 293 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. K. Lee, I. W. Kang, E. S. Lee, S. J. Min, S. W. Cho, and D. H. Hwang
Osteoid Osteoma of the Tarsal Cuboid Mimicking Osteomyelitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 341 - 342.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ImagingHome page
C Fang and J Teh
Imaging of the hip
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
P. T. Liu, F. S. Chivers, C. C. Roberts, C. J. Schultz, and C. P. Beauchamp
Imaging of Osteoid Osteoma with Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 691 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
A. J. Aschoff, E. M. Merkle, S. N. Emancipator, C. A. Petersilge, J. L. Duerk, and J. S. Lewin
Femur: MR Imaging-guided Radio-frequency Ablation in a Porcine Model— Feasibility Study
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 471 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. S. Ebrahim, J. A. Jacobson, J. Lin, J. A. Housner, C. W. Hayes, and D. Resnick
Intraarticular Osteoid Osteoma: Sonographic Findings in Three Patients with Radiographic, CT, and MR Imaging Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1391 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. L. WEBER and B. F. MORREY
Osteoid Osteoma of the Elbow: A Diagnostic Challenge
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1999; 81(8): 1111 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
F. LÓPEZ-BAREA, D. HARDISSON, J. L. RODRÍGUEZ-PERALTO, S. SÁNCHEZ-HERRERA, and M. LAMAS
Intracortical Hemangioma of Bone. Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1998; 80(11): 1673 - 8.
[Full Text]

Home page
 J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
Y. WILSON, I. FOGELMAN, and D. M. EVANS
Detection of an Elusive Osteoid Osteoma Using a Registration Bone Scan
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., December 1, 1997; 22(6): 801 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
C. Rougerie, O. Pidet, X. Chevalier, B. Larget-Piet, D. Goutallier, and P. Claudepierre
Apparent hip osteoarthritis in a 16 year old girl
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 1997; 56(6): 343 - 345.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.