Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heywang-Kobrunner, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nathrath, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heywang-Kobrunner, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nathrath, W. B.

Radiology, Vol 191, 639-646, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine

SH Heywang-Kobrunner, J Haustein, C Pohl, R Beck, B Lommatzsch, M Untch and WB Nathrath
Department of Radiology, University of Halle, Germany.

PURPOSE: To optimize detection and diagnosis of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional fast low-angle shot pulse sequence was used for a group comparison consisting of 76 high-dose (0.16 mmol gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight) and 76 low-dose (0.1 mmol/kg) examinations. Intraindividual comparisons were possible in a subgroup of 20 patients. RESULTS: Enhancement with the high dose was about 1.5 times higher for benign and malignant tissues. With the lower dose, no false-positive findings could be avoided and definition of a threshold that excluded false-negative findings was problematic. Conspicuity of malignant lesions was much improved with the higher dose (a good to excellent rating in 81% vs 26% with the lower dose). Three small foci were visible only with the higher dose. CONCLUSION: The higher dose of contrast material allowed much better results. Dose comparison studies are also recommended for other techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Dromain, C. Balleyguier, S. Muller, M.-C. Mathieu, F. Rochard, P. Opolon, and R. Sigal
Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W528 - W537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Jacobs, P. B. Barker, D. A. Bluemke, C. Maranto, C. Arnold, E. H. Herskovits, and Z. Bhujwalla
Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: Diagnosis with Multiparametric MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 225 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. V. Knopp, M. W. Bourne, F. Sardanelli, M. N. Wasser, L. Bonomo, C. Boetes, M. Muller-Schimpfle, M. A. Hall-Craggs, B. Hamm, A. Orlacchio, et al.
Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Analysis of Dose Response and Comparison with Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 663 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Weinstein, S. Strano, P. Cohen, S. Fields, J. M. Gomori, and H. Degani
Breast Fibroadenoma: Mapping of Pathophysiologic Features with Three-Time-Point, Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging—Pilot Study
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 233 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.