|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 191, 727-733, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
PJ Matsi, HI Manninen, RL Vanninen, MT Suhonen, I Oksala, M Laakso, T Hakkarainen and S Soimakallio
Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the femoropopliteal arteries in patients with claudication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 106 claudicants (71 men and 35 women, aged 41-90 years [mean, 67 years]), a total of 208 lesions in 140 limbs were treated. The patients were followed up for 12-36 months. The patency rates were based on determination of the ankle-brachial index. RESULTS: The hemodynamic success rate for all the treated limbs was 89%, 99% for femoropopliteal stenoses (n = 71) and 80% for femoropopliteal occlusions (n = 69). In multiple logistic regression analysis, a smaller number of diseased vessels (one to two vs three to seven) and milder lesion severity (stenosis vs occlusion) correlated favorably with early success. Survival analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method according to established criteria revealed 1-, 2-, and 3-year primary patency rates of 47% (27 of 57 limbs), 41% (14 of 34 limbs), and 43% (three of seven limbs), respectively. CONCLUSION: In selected cases, good primary success and acceptable long-term results can be achieved with femoropopliteal angioplasty in claudicants.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gerhard-Herman, J. M Gardin, M. Jaff, E. Mohler, M. Roman, and T. Z Naqvi Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 183 - 200. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kobayashi, K. Hida, H. Shikata, S. Sakamoto, and J. Matsubara Long Term Outcome of Femoropopliteal Bypass for Claudication and Critical Ischemia Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 208 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Pearce and J. F. McKinsey Current Status of Intravascular Stents as Delivery Devices to Prevent Restenosis Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2003; 37(4): 231 - 237. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wolosker, L. Nakano, M. M. M. Anacleto, and P. Puech-Leao Primary Utilization of Stents in Angioplasty of Superficial Femoral Artery Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2003; 37(4): 271 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Faries, N. J. Morrissey, V. Teodorescu, E. C. Gravereaux, J. A. Burks JR, A. Carroccio, K. C. Kent, L. H. Hollier, and M. L. Marin Recent Advances in Peripheral Angioplasty and Stenting Angiology, November 1, 2002; 53(6): 617 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Jamsen, H. I. Manninen, P. A. Jaakkola, and P. J. Matsi Long-term Outcome of Patients with Claudication after Balloon Angioplasty of the Femoropopliteal Arteries Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 345 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schillinger, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, M. Haumer, R. Ahmadi, H. Rumpold, O. Wagner, and E. Minar Inflammatory Response to Stent Implantation: Differences in Femoropopliteal, Iliac, and Carotid Arteries Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 529 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Alfke, J. J. Froelich, S. Nowak, and H.-J. Wagner Cardiovascular Risk Factors Do Not Predict Clinically Defined Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Lower Limb Ischemia Angiology, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 15 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. L. Gordon, R. M. Conroy, M. Arefi, J. M. Tobis, E. A. Stemmer, and S. E. Wilson Three-Year Outcome of Endovascular Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion Arch Surg, February 1, 2001; 136(2): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lammer, M. D. Dake, J. Bleyn, B. T. Katzen, M. Cejna, P. Piquet, G. J. Becker, and R. A. Settlage Peripheral Arterial Obstruction: Prospective Study of Treatment with a Transluminally Placed Self-expanding Stent-Graft Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 95 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |