Radiology, Vol 191, 741-745, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with x-ray angiography

PM Rodgers, J Ward, CJ Baudouin, JP Ridgway and PJ Robinson
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To compare dynamic contrast material--enhanced multisection magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with x-ray angiography in the evaluation of the portal venous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients underwent preoperative x-ray angiography and dynamic contrast- enhanced MR imaging. MR imaging was performed at 1.0 T with a multisection breath-hold fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique in the coronal-oblique plane, before and after injection of a bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The portal vein, its right and left intrahepatic branches, the splenic veins, and the superior mesenteric veins were examined. The presence of varices was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 84 vessels evaluated with both techniques, appearances were similar in 76 (90%). Both examinations showed the main portal vein to be patent in nine patients, occluded in five, and patent but abnormal in two. Findings in the main portal vein were discordant in two patients. In one patient, surgical follow-up helped confirm the findings at MR imaging. CONCLUSION: MR imaging can replace x-ray angiography in the preoperative evaluation of portal vein patency in most patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Stamou, K. G. Toutouzas, P. B. Kekis, S. Nakos, A. Gafou, A. Manouras, E. Krespis, S. Katsaragakis, and J. Bramis Prospective Study of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Postsplenectomy Thrombosis of the Portal, Mesenteric, and Splenic Veins Arch Surg, July 1, 2006; 141(7): 663 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Pancreatic Section Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas Gut, June 1, 2005; 54(suppl_5): v1 - v16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kreft, H. Strunk, S. Flacke, M. Wolff, R. Conrad, J. Gieseke, D. Pauleit, R. Bachmann, A. Hirner, and H. H. Schild Detection of Thrombosis in the Portal Venous System: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 86 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O. Ernst, V. Asnar, G. Sergent, E. Lederman, L. Nicol, J.-C. Paris, and C. L'Hermine Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold MR Angiography and Conventional Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 433 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Okumura, Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, T. Ishimori, Y. Amoh, K. Oda, and Y. Dodo Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Portography RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 973 - 987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kopka, J. Rodenwaldt, R. Vosshenrich, U. Fischer, B. Renner, T. Lorf, J. Graessner, B. Ringe, and E. Grabbe Hepatic Blood Supply: Comparison of Optimized Dual Phase Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text]