Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lees, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lees, W. R.

Radiology, Vol 192, 253-259, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Three-dimensional US of the fetus. Work in progress

IM Kelly, JE Gardener, AD Brett, R Richards and WR Lees
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University College of London Hospitals, Middlesex Hospital, England.

PURPOSE: To develop a system for three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography (US) that readily interfaces with conventional equipment and to apply this system to fetal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An acquisition system based on transputer technology records from the video output of standard clinical scanners was interfaced with a position-sensing device, one component of which was attached to the US probe. The method differs from other 3D US methods as any conventional probe may be used, freehand scanning is possible, and no line-of-sight limitations operate. Such scanning was performed of 25 fetuses with gestation ages of 7-30 weeks. RESULTS: Acquisition typically took 3-5 seconds. Acquisition and reconstruction were successful in 17 of 25 cases and were easiest to perform in the first and second trimester. Surface rendering revealed anatomic detail that was not depicted with two- dimensional scanning. CONCLUSION: The technique has the potential for recording complete anatomic studies for review and visualization of detail that is difficult to perceive on conventional US scans.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. J. Lee, B. I. Choi, J. K. Han, A. Y. Kim, K. W. Kim, S. H. Park, J. Y. Jeong, and J. W. Kang
Three-dimensional Ultrasonography Using the Minimum Transparent Mode in Obstructive Biliary Diseases: Early Experience
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 443 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. M. Hamper, V. Trapanotto, M. R. DeJong, S. Sheth, and C. I. Caskey
Three-dimensional US of the Prostate: Early Experience
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Baba, T. Okai, S. Kozuma, and Y. Taketani
Fetal Abnormalities: Evaluation with Real-time–Processible Three-dimensional US—Preliminary Report
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 441 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.