Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, H. E.

Radiology, Vol 192, 33-36, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Perioperative implantation of iridium-192 as the boost technique for stage I and II breast cancer: results of a 10-year study of 655 patients

CM Mansfield, LT Komarnicky, GF Schwartz, AL Rosenberg, L Krishnan, WR Jewell, FE Rosato, ML Moses, D Barbot and HE Cohn
Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5097.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of perioperative implantation of iridium-192 for stage I and II breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed findings from 655 patients with stage I and II cancer treated with conservative surgery and Ir-192 implantation between 1982 and 1992. Hollow plastic tubes were placed in the tumor bed as a single- or double-plane implant at lumpectomy. Ribbons with Ir-192 seeds were inserted into the tubes 4-6 hours later. The Ir-192 was left in place for approximately 50 hours. External-beam irradiation was given to the whole breast 10-14 days later. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 2 to 146 months. The local control at 10 years for stage I and II disease was 93% and 87%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial survival rate was 92% +/- 1 for stage I disease and 72% +/- 4 for stage II disease. The rate of survival with no evidence of disease for stage I and II disease combined was 82% +/- 1 at 5 years and 75% +/- 3 at 10 years. CONCLUSION: Perioperative implantation produced excellent local control equal to that with electron-beam therapy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.