|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 192, 99-102, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
JW Keyes Jr, BA Harkness, KM Greven, DW Williams 3rd, NE Watson Jr and WF McGuirt
Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
PURPOSE: To determine whether positron emission tomography (PET) can help differentiate benign from malignant lesions of the salivary glands before surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Masses of the salivary glands were examined in 26 patients by means of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, PET, biopsy (n = 18), and surgery. Contiguous PET scans were obtained from the midcranium to the lower chest 45 minutes after administration of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Standard uptake values (SUVs) were determined for all suspect lesions and for normal parotid glands and cerebellum. RESULTS: All lesions were visualized, and all but two showed some increase in FDG uptake. PET findings helped correctly differentiate benign from malignant masses in 18 (69%) but were false-positive for malignancy in eight (31%). SUV analysis, lesion-to-normal SUV ratios, and lesion-to-cerebellar SUV ratios also failed to differentiate the lesions. CONCLUSION: FDG PET is not useful in classifying salivary gland tumors as benign or malignant.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. N. Shah and B. F. Branstetter IV Oncocytoma of the Parotid Gland: A Potential False-Positive Finding on 18F-FDG PET Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): W212 - W214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-S. Jeong, M. K. Chung, Y.-I. Son, J. Y. Choi, H. J. Kim, Y. H. Ko, and C.-H. Baek Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Management of High-Grade Salivary Gland Malignancies J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1237 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Roh, C. H. Ryu, S.-H. Choi, J. S. Kim, J. H. Lee, K.-J. Cho, S. Y. Nam, and S. Y. Kim Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Patients with Salivary Gland Malignancies J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 240 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, M. B. Fukui, C. H. Snyderman, B. F. Branstetter IV, B. M. McCook, D. W. Townsend, and C. C. Meltzer Combined PET-CT in the Head and Neck: Part 1. Physiologic, Altered Physiologic, and Artifactual FDG Uptake RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 897 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Kim, J. Czernin, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, B. S. Halpern, B. J. Fueger, J. R. Hecht, O. Ratib, M. E. Phelps, and W. A. Weber Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET, In-Line PET/CT, and Software Fusion for Restaging of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 587 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G J R Cook Nuclear medicine in imaging head and neck malignancies Imaging, September 1, 2003; 15(3): 141 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Yousem, M. A. Kraut, and A. A. Chalian Major Salivary Gland Imaging Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 19 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |