Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, J. S.

Radiology, Vol 192, 351-357, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time- of-flight MR angiography

TR McCauley, A Monib, KW Dickey, J Clemett, GH Meier, TK Egglin, RJ Gusberg, M Rosenblatt and JS Pollak
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and reliability of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for identification of stenosis and patent distal vessels in patients with peripheral vascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and conventional arteriography were performed in 22 patients. Four blinded radiologists independently graded multiple anatomic segments. RESULTS: MR angiography allowed detection of more patent vessel segments than did conventional arteriography. For detection of significant stenosis (> 75%), MR angiography had 43%-67% sensitivity and 74%-89% specificity. Discrepancies in detection of significant stenosis occurred in 39 segments for the most accurate reviewer; 27 of these discrepancies were avoidable. CONCLUSION: For detection of significant stenosis, MR angiography has low to moderate sensitivity and specificity; however, observer variability appears to be a major contributing factor to the discrepancies. Greater reviewer experience or techniques for improving reliability may improve the accuracy of MR angiography in peripheral vascular disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Miyazaki and V. S. Lee
Nonenhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 20 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Korosoglou, W. D. Gilson, M. Schar, A. Ustun, L. V. Hofmann, D. L. Kraitchman, and M. Stuber
Hind Limb Ischemia in Rabbit Model: T2-prepared versus Time-of-Flight MR Angiography at 3 T
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 761 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Tatli, M. J. Lipton, B. D. Davison, R. B. Skorstad, and E. K. Yucel
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: MR Imaging of Aortic and Peripheral Vascular Disease
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2003; 23(90001): S59 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. L. Martin, K. H. Tay, B. Flak, P. D. Fry, D. L. Doyle, D. C. Taylor, Y. N. Hsiang, and L. S. Machan
Multidetector CT Angiography of the Aortoiliac System and Lower Extremities: A Prospective Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1085 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. S. Swan, T. J. Carroll, T. W. Kennell, D. M. Heisey, F. R. Korosec, R. Frayne, C. A. Mistretta, and T. M. Grist
Time-resolved Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Peripheral Vessels
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 43 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. F. Hany, T. J. Carroll, R. A. Omary, E. Esparza-Coss, F. R. Korosec, C. A. Mistretta, and T. M. Grist
Aorta and Runoff Vessels: Single-Injection MR Angiography with Automated Table Movement Compared with Multiinjection Time-resolved MR Angiography—Initial Results
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 266 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. G. Ruehm, T. F. Hany, T. Pfammatter, E. Schneider, M. Ladd, and J. F. Debatin
Pelvic and Lower Extremity Arterial Imaging: Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1127 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. M. Rofsky and M. A. Adelman
MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. M. Meaney, J. P. Ridgway, S. Chakraverty, I. Robertson, D. Kessel, A. Radjenovic, M. Kouwenhoven, A. Kassner, and M. A. Smith
Stepping-Table Gadolinium- enhanced Digital Subtraction MR Angiography of the Aorta and Lower Extremity Arteries: Preliminary Experience
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 59 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.