|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 192, 793-795, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
L Liberman, DD Dershaw, PP Rosen, AF Abramson, BM Deutch and LE Hann
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
PURPOSE: To determine the optimum number of specimens to obtain at stereotaxic core breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stereotaxic biopsies were performed in 145 mammographically evident lesions by using a dedicated table with patients in the prone position. Samples were obtained with an automated gun and a 14-gauge needle. Indications for biopsy were calcifications (n = 53) and masses (n = 92). Three to 11 (mean, 5.4) core biopsy specimens were obtained per lesion and were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Diagnostic material was obtained in the first specimen in 102 (70%) of the 145 lesions. Obtaining two, three, four, five, and six core specimens yielded a diagnosis in 117 (81%), 129 (89%), 132 (91%), 137 (94%), and 140 (97%) of the 145 lesions, respectively. Obtaining five specimens yielded a diagnosis in 46 (87%) of the 53 calcifications and 91 (99%) of the 92 masses. Obtaining six specimens resulted in a diagnosis in 49 (92%) lesions evident as calcifications but did not improve the yield on masses. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic 14-gauge core biopsy achieved a 99% diagnostic yield with five specimens for masses. Additional specimens may be necessary to diagnose some calcified lesions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. F. Dillon, E. W. Mc Dermott, and C. M. Quinn Management of B3 Lesions and Breast Biopsies Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 15(7): 2055 - 2056. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E A Rakha and I O Ellis An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1300 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Dillon, E. W. McDermott, A. D. Hill, A. O'Doherty, N. O'Higgins, and C. M. Quinn Predictive Value of Breast Lesions of "Uncertain Malignant Potential" and "Suspicious for Malignancy" Determined by Needle Core Biopsy Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 704 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M F Dillon, C M Quinn, E W McDermott, A O'Doherty, N O'Higgins, and A D K Hill Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice. J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 59(7): 740 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jackman and J. Rodriguez-Soto Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy--frequency, causes, and outcome. Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 61 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Koskela, M. Sudah, M. H. Berg, V. J. Karja, P. K. Mustonen, V. Kataja, and R. S. Vanninen Add-on Device for Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: How Many Biopsy Specimens Are Needed for a Reliable Diagnosis? Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 801 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Haka, K. E. Shafer-Peltier, M. Fitzmaurice, J. Crowe, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld Diagnosing breast cancer by using Raman spectroscopy PNAS, August 30, 2005; 102(35): 12371 - 12376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Lomoschitz, T. H. Helbich, M. Rudas, G. Pfarl, K. F. Linnau, A. Stadler, and R. J. Jackman Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Influence of Number of Specimens on Diagnostic Accuracy Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 897 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Yang, G. J. Whitman, M. M. Johnson, M. Bolanos-Clark, A. C. Kushwaha, K. K. Hunt, and P. J. Dempsey Needle Localization for Excisional Biopsy of Breast Lesions: Comparison of Effect of Use of Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammographic Guidance on Procedure Time Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 277 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R O'Leary, K Hawkins, J C S Beazley, M R J Lansdown, and A M Hanby Agreement between preoperative core needle biopsy and postoperative invasive breast cancer histopathology is not dependent on the amount of clinical material obtained J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2004; 57(2): 193 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. McCready Quality Assurance: The Value of Data and the Will to Improve Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 837 - 838. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, C. Overbeeke, M. D. Kirshenbaum, P. Patel, G. Kaplan, V. Maker, C. August, and R. P. Cavallino Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Using a Conventional Mammography Unit with an Add-On Device Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 527 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shousha Issues in the Interpretation of Breast Core Biopsies International Journal of Surgical Pathology, July 1, 2003; 11(3): 167 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Guenin and L. Liberman To Excise or To Sample Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1175 - 1176. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Fishman, C. Milikowski, R. Ramsinghani, M. V. Velasquez, and G. Aviram US-guided Core-Needle Biopsy of the Breast: How Many Specimens Are Necessary? Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 779 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Philpotts, R. J. Hooley, and C. H. Lee Comparison of Automated Versus Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods for Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 347 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Brenner, R. J. Jackman, S. H. Parker, W. P. Evans III, L. Philpotts, B. M. Deutch, M. C. Lechner, D. Lehrer, P. Sylvan, R. Hunt, et al. Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy of Radial Scars of the Breast: When Is Excision Necessary? Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1179 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. H. Helbich Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1221 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Becker, D. Taves, L. McCurdy, G. Muscedere, S. Karlik, and S. Ward Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Comparison of Film Versus Digital Mammography, Both Using an Add-On Unit Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1451 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Parker, A. J. Klaus, P. J. Mc Wey, K. J. Schilling, T. E. Cupples, N. Duchesne, M. A. Guenin, and J. K. Harness Sonographically Guided Directional Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Using a Handheld Device Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 405 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Kuhl, N. Morakkabati, C. C. Leutner, A. Schmiedel, E. Wardelmann, and H. H. Schild MR Imaging-guided Large-Core (14-Gauge) Needle Biopsy of Small Lesions Visible at Breast MR Imaging Alone Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Brem, J. M. Schoonjans, S. N. Goodman, A. Nolten, F. B. Askin, and O. M. B. Gatewood Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Percutaneous Diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Devices Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 793 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman, C. L. Benton, D. D. Dershaw, A. F. Abramson, L. R. LaTrenta, and E. A. Morris Learning Curve for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: How Many Cases Are Enough? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 721 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N J Coombs, J R L Laddie, G T Royle, C M Rubin, and M S Briley Improving the sensitivity of stereotactic core biopsy to diagnose ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a mathematical model Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2001; 74(878): 123 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jackman, F. Burbank, S. H. Parker, W. P. Evans III, M. C. Lechner, T. R. Richardson, A. A. Smid, H. B. Borofsky, C. H. Lee, H. M. Goldstein, et al. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Determinants of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Underestimation Rates Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 497 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, H. E. Mrose, and O. B. Ioffe Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia or Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Breast Biopsy Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 503 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H Denley, S E Pinder, C W Elston, A H S Lee, and I O Ellis Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2001; 54(1): 20 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman, H. S. Cody III, A. D. K. Hill, P. P. Rosen, S. D. J. Yeh, T. Akhurst, E. A. Morris, A. F. Abramson, P. I. Borgen, and D. D. Dershaw Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Percutaneous Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Parker, M. A. Dennis, A. T. Stavros, and K. K. Johnson Ultrasound-Guided Mamtmeotomoy: A New Breast Biopsy Technique Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 1996; 12(3): 113 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |