Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schnall, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schnall, M.

Radiology, Vol 193, 49-57, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hepatic metastases and cavernous hemangiomas: distinction with standard- and triple-dose gadoteridol-enhanced MR imaging

DG Mitchell, S Saini, J Weinreb, EE De Lange, VM Runge, JE Kuhlman, Y Parisky, CD Johnson, JJ Brown and M Schnall
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

PURPOSE: To determine if hepatic metastases can be distinguished from cavernous hemangiomas by pattern analysis of magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained prior to and following administration of gadoteridol at standard (0.1 mmol/kg) and triple (0.3 mmol/kg) doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients with proved hepatic metastases (n = 71) or cavernous hemangiomas (n = 24) underwent MR imaging at 16 different institutions. T2-weighted spin-echo and T1-weighted images were obtained before and after gadoteridol administration. Two independent blinded reviewers rated individual features of benignancy versus malignancy on a five-point confidence scale. RESULTS: The most useful diagnostic features, with 100% specificity, were nodular enhancement for hemangiomas and rim enhancement for metastases. Confident (definitely benign or definitely malignant) diagnoses were rendered in 80 of 95 cases (84%), with an accuracy of a confident diagnosis of 96%. CONCLUSION: The pattern of enhancement on T1-weighted images is highly accurate for distinction between hemangiomas and metastases in images obtained with both doses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Jia, C. O'Dell, J. T. Heverhagen, X. Yang, J. Liang, R. V. Jacko, S. Sammet, T. Pellas, P. Cole, and M. V. Knopp
Colorectal Liver Metastases: Contrast Agent Diffusion Coefficient for Quantification of Contrast Enhancement Heterogeneity at MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 901 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. J. Burkholz and A. C. Silva
AJR Teaching File: Hypervascular Metastasis or Hepatic Hemangioma?
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6_Supplement): S53 - S56.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, H. Kondo, Y. Tsuge, R. Yokoyama, K. Kajita, M. Onozuka, Y. Suzuki, M. Van Cauteren, and N. Moriyama
Gadolinium-Enhanced Multiphasic 3D MRI of the Liver with Prospective Adaptive Navigator Correction: Phantom Study and Preliminary Clinical Evaluation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): W309 - W316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-S. Yu and N. M. Rofsky
Hepatic metastases: perilesional enhancement on dynamic MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P Manoharan and J Ward
MRI in the assessment of focal liver lesions in the non-cirrhotic patient
Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 338 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. C. Vilanova, J. Barcelo, J. G. Smirniotopoulos, R. Perez-Andres, M. Villalon, J. Miro, F. Martin, J. Capellades, and P. R. Ros
Hemangioma from Head to Toe: MR Imaging with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 367 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I.-M. Danet, R. C. Semelka, P. Leonardou, L. Braga, G. Vaidean, J. T. Woosley, and M. Kanematsu
Spectrum of MRI Appearances of Untreated Metastases of the Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 809 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Carlos, H. M. Kim, H. K. Hussain, I. R. Francis, H. V. Nghiem, and A. M. Fendrick
Developing a Prediction Rule to Assess Hepatic Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 893 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. C. Mueller, H. K. Hussain, R. C. Carlos, H. V. Nghiem, and I. R. Francis
Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Characterizing Small Hepatic Lesions: Routine Versus Expert Interpretation
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, R. C. Semelka, M. Matsuo, H. Kondo, M. Enya, S. Goshima, N. Moriyama, and H. Hoshi
Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver: Optimizing Imaging Delay for Hepatic Arterial and Portal Venous Phases—A Prospective Randomized Study in Patients with Chronic Liver Damage
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 407 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. L. Bennett, A. Petersein, W. W. Mayo-Smith, P. F. Hahn, W. Schima, and S. Saini
Addition of Gadolinium Chelates to Heavily T2-Weighted MR Imaging: Limited Role in Differentiating Hepatic Hemangiomas from Metastases
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.