Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothpearl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Raia, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothpearl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Raia, C.

Radiology, Vol 194, 125-130, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR urography: technique and application

A Rothpearl, D Frager, A Subramanian, B Bashist, J Baer, C Kay, K Cooke and C Raia
Department of Radiology, St Lukes/Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10025.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a magnetic resonance (MR) technique for depicting the kidneys and urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with urinary tract obstruction and 20 without obstructions were examined with a modified, heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo pulse sequence (MR urography). In addition, six healthy volunteers underwent modified MR urography with intravenous administration of furosemide and ureteral compression prior to imaging. RESULTS: MR urography provided high-resolution images of the kidneys and urinary tract in all patients with obstruction with intact collecting systems. Anatomic anomalies were depicted in two patients. Intraluminal neoplasia was well demonstrated in both obstructed and nonobstructed systems (n = 4). Furosemide-enhanced MR urography provided fine anatomic and functional detail of both the kidneys and urinary tract (n = 6). CONCLUSION: MR urography may provide an alternative to more conventional urinary tract imaging techniques. It does not require ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast material. When combined with furosemide and ureteral compression, MR urography provides fine detail and reflects function.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. R. Leyendecker, C. E. Barnes, and R. J. Zagoria
MR Urography: Techniques and Clinical Applications
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 23 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. F. J. Browne, C. P. Meehan, J. Colville, R. Power, and W. C. Torreggiani
Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract: Spectrum of Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1609 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Teh, E. S. Ang, W. C. Wong, S. B. Tan, A. G. S. Tan, S. M. Chng, M. B. K. Lin, and J. S. K. Goh
MR Renography Using a Dynamic Gradient-Echo Sequence and Low-Dose Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as an Alternative to Radionuclide Renography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 441 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Rohrschneider, S. Haufe, M. Wiesel, B. Tonshoff, R. Wunsch, K. Darge, J. H. Clorius, and J. Troger
Functional and Morphologic Evaluation of Congenital Urinary Tract Dilatation by Using Combined Static-Dynamic MR Urography: Findings in Kidneys with a Single Collecting System
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Sudah, R. Vanninen, K. Partanen, A. Heino, P. Vainio, and M. Ala-Opas
MR Urography in Evaluation of Acute Flank Pain: T2-Weighted Sequences and Gadolinium-Enhanced Three-Dimensional FLASH Compared with Urography
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 105 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Neri, P. Boraschi, D. Caramella, L. Battolla, R. Gigoni, N. Armillotta, G. Braccini, and C. Bartolozzi
MR Virtual Endoscopy of the Upper Urinary Tract
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1697 - 1702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. M. Maher, T. A. S. Prasad, J. M. Fitzpatrick, J. Corr, D. H. Williams, J. T. Ennis, and J. G. Murray
Spinal Dysraphism at MR Urography: Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 237 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.