Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Go, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kaczur, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Go, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kaczur, T.

Radiology, Vol 194, 151-155, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Hibernating myocardium versus scar: severity of irreversible decreased myocardial perfusion in prediction of tissue viability

RT Go, WJ MacIntyre, GB Saha, SA Cook, DR Neumann, EQ Chen, DA Underwood and T Kaczur
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195- 5074.

PURPOSE: To determine whether quantitation of the relative severity of decreased perfusion in irreversible defects on myocardial perfusion images enables differentiation of viable hibernating myocardium from scar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 145 patients with previous myocardial infarction, 1,252 regions with irreversible defects proved by means of rubidium-82 rest-stress imaging were analyzed for relative severity (percentage decrease in perfusion). Myocardial tissue viability was determined by means of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). RESULTS: The relative decreases in Rb-82 uptake in the 1,252 regions were categorized into nine levels of severity (30% to > or = 70%) in 381 regions of hibernating myocardium and 871 regions of scar. The values of relative decreased perfusion in the irreversible defects alone did not enable differentiation of hibernating myocardium and scar (P = .61). CONCLUSION: The results show no relationship between the relative severity of irreversible perfusion defects and the ability to distinguish between hibernating myocardium and scar.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.