Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macfarlane, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macfarlane, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, R. L.

Radiology, Vol 194, 425-429, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Triple-head SPECT with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG): initial evaluation in oncology and comparison with FDG PET

DJ Macfarlane, L Cotton, RJ Ackermann, H Minn, EP Ficaro, PD Shreve and RL Wahl
Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Hospitals 48109- 0028.

PURPOSE: In patients with cancer, performance was assessed of a commercially available triple-head gamma camera fitted with ultra-high energy parallel-hole collimators performing single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D- glucose (FDG). Results were compared with those of positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Performance characteristics were first determined in phantom studies for FDG PET and triple-head gamma camera SPECT systems. In 13 patients with malignancies, FDG PET was followed by SPECT of the same region, and imaging results were independently assessed. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the PET and SPECT systems was 58.3 counts/MBq/min and 4.5 counts/MBq/min, respectively. Reconstructed spatial resolution was approximately 7 mm for PET and 20 mm for SPECT. All known cancer foci were detected at PET. SPECT depicted 11 of the 22 lesions detected at PET, but only five of the 14 lesions less than 3 cm in diameter. CONCLUSION: FDG SPECT performed with a specially collimated triple-head gamma camera depicted some cancers but had an unacceptably low sensitivity compared with PET for lesions less than 3 cm in diameter. PET is preferable for detecting small cancers.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.