Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanninen, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soimakallio, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanninen, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soimakallio, S.

Radiology, Vol 194, 459-467, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography

RL Vanninen, HI Manninen, PL Partanen, PA Vainio and S Soimakallio
Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) flow quantification in the evaluation of suspected carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients referred for angiography and 10 healthy volunteers underwent Doppler ultrasound, three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR phase-contrast flow quantification to measure peak systolic velocity (PSV) and volumetric flow rate (VFR) in the common and internal carotid arteries distal to the stenosis. RESULTS: PSV and VFR were significantly lower in the severely (> or = 70%) stenosed internal carotid arteries (P < .05). The VFR ratio (internal carotid artery-common carotid artery) achieved 91% overall accuracy for detection of severe stenosis. Combination of flow data with results of MR angiography yielded sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 78%-100%) with a modest loss in specificity. Doppler and MR measurements of PSV in the common carotid artery showed significant correlation: volunteers, r = .73; patients, r = .64. CONCLUSION: MR flow quantification provides information about the hemodynamic significance of carotid stenosis. As an adjunct to MR angiography, it may be useful in enabling differentiation of occlusions from critical stenoses.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.