Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adamis, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adamis, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, R. R.

Radiology, Vol 196, 689-695, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence

MK Adamis, W Li, PA Wielopolski, D Kim, EJ Sax, KC Kent and RR Edelman
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical feasibility of a contrast material-- enhanced two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic sequence in lower extremity arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four healthy volunteers and 12 patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography; all patients also underwent conventional angiography. A 2D multisection gradient-echo sequence with image subtraction was used for all MR imaging examinations. RESULTS: Oblique-coronal contrast- enhanced MR angiography was completed in less than 4 minutes, with a 256 x 512 matrix. The arterial contrast enhancement ratio was 2.0 +/- 0.8 (standard deviation), and the pre- and post-contrast contrast-to- noise ratios were 2.1 +/- 13.8 and 46.2 +/- 18.7, respectively. The sensitivity for MR angiography was 100% and specificity was 69% for distinction of vessels with greater than 50% stenoses from normal or mildly stenotic vessels. CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced 2D MR angiography is capable of increasing intraarterial signal intensity and depicting small vessel anatomy of the lower extremities over a large field of view in a short imaging time.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.