Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castelijns, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Snow, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castelijns, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Snow, G. B.

Radiology, Vol 196, 735-739, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Predictive value of MR imaging-dependent and non-MR imaging-dependent parameters for recurrence of laryngeal cancer after radiation therapy

JA Castelijns, MW van den Brekel, EM Smit, H Tobi, FW van Wagtendonk, RP Golding, HW Venema, C van Schaik and GB Snow
Department of Radiology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of several clinical and radiologic parameters for recurrence of laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty previously untreated patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before radiation therapy with curative intent. Tumor volume was calculated from T1-weighted MR images. Cartilage was considered invaded by pathologic tissue if it had intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) MR images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted SE MR images. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Parameters such as age, sex, histopathologic findings, and invasion of the vocal muscle or pre-epiglottic space were not significantly correlated with tumor recurrence. Logistic regression analysis showed three relevant contributors: cord mobility, as judged clinically, and tumor volume and, more significantly, cartilage invasion, as seen at MR imaging. CONCLUSION: For untreated laryngeal cancer, MR imaging findings of tumor volume and cartilage invasion allow better patient selection for either radiation therapy or surgery. MR imaging is mandatory for T staging of laryngeal cancer.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.