Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marzano, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gasbarrini, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marzano, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gasbarrini, G.

Radiology, Vol 209, 813-817, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Early renal involvement in diabetes mellitus: comparison of renal Doppler US and radioisotope evaluation of glomerular hyperfiltration

MA Marzano, M Pompili, GL Rapaccini, M Covino, P Cotroneo, A Manto, L Todaro, G Ghirlanda and G Gasbarrini
Department of Internal Medicine II, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of Doppler ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of hyperfiltration in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients with IDDM were studied. All patients were normotensive and had normal creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was evaluated by means of plasma clearance of chromium-51 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, urinary albumin excretion, US evaluation of renal volume, and Doppler evaluation of resistance index (RI) in the renal interlobar arteries. The patients were divided according to GFR into the following groups: those with hyperfiltering kidneys (group 1, n = 40) and those with normofiltering kidneys (group 2, n = 41). RESULTS: The median renal volume was 351 mL (95% CI = 337 mL, 379 mL) in group 1 and 318 mL (95% CI = 300 mL, 335 mL) in group 2 (P = .005). The number of patients with microalbuminuria was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (P = .02). The median RI was significantly lower in group 1 (0.55; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.57) than in group 2 (0.57; 95% CI = 0.56, 0.59) (P = .04). An RI of less than 0.5, a renal volume greater than 410 mL/m2, and the absence of microalbuminuria were independent predictors of hyperfiltration. An RI of less than 0.5 and a renal volume greater than 410 mL/m2 showed high specificity (98% and 95%, respectively) and poor sensitivity (25% and 23%, respectively) in the diagnosis of hyperfiltration in IDDM patients. CONCLUSION: Both RI and renal volume showed correlation with GFR, but neither parameter is sufficiently sensitive in screening for hyperfiltration in IDDM patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
P. Fiorina, M. Venturini, F. Folli, C. Losio, P. Maffi, C. Placidi, S. La Rosa, E. Orsenigo, C. Socci, C. Capella, et al.
Natural History of Kidney Graft Survival, Hypertrophy, and Vascular Function in End-Stage Renal Disease Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients: Beneficial impact of pancreas and successful islet cotransplantation
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2005; 28(6): 1303 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.